Character Program
DATA
-
6 Meta Analysis reviews
-
395 Studies
-
430,000 Students in research
-
4 Confidence level. link
Category: Content
DEFINED
Character education: Includes activities and experiences aiming to foster positive character development and the associated core ethical values.
BENEFITS
Improved academic achievement — higher grades and standardized test scores, with the strongest effects in reading and math; a meta-analysis of 52 studies found a positive association between character education and achievement, with effects holding across ethnicity and socioeconomic status. ac+1
Schools with character education accreditation show better academic progress and school climate with no evidence of an academic opportunity cos. tandfonline
Behavior & Discipline- Fewer suspensions, discipline referrals, and dropouts. files.eric.ed
Increased self-control and reduced disruptive behavior. jubileecentre.ac
Reduced bullying, aggression, and violence. rdw.rowan
Decreased risky behaviors such as drug use. journal.uny.ac
Social-emotional development: Improved emotional competency, moral judgment, and socio-moral cognitive development. journal.uny.ac
Stronger prosocial behavior, empathy, and conflict-resolution skills. files.eric.ed
Better peer and teacher-student relationships. ijssbulletin
School climate: Improved school culture, feelings of safety, and sense of belonging. journal.uny.ac
Higher attendance and student engagement. Yale Medicine
Greater student motivation and school commitment. countyhealthrankings
Higher high school graduation rates and increased college attendance. steinhardt.nyu
Benefits persist for years — longitudinal research shows better social relationships and fewer health and legal problems up to 18 years later. apa
HOW TO
Model the character you teach — teachers act as caregivers, models, and mentors; students mirror the kindness, fairness, and integrity that adults show. Link
Build a shared language of character — define core values (respect, honesty, responsibility) with students, post them, and use them consistently across lessons and interactions. jubileecentre.ac
Be intentional and proactive, not reactive — deliberately plan character development into lessons and routines rather than waiting for teachable moments. eric.ed
Create a democratic classroom — involve students in setting rules, making decisions, and shaping the classroom community. ascd
Use morning meetings or community circles — regular gatherings where students express thoughts, resolve conflicts, practice empathy, and give one another compliments.
Practice moral discipline — treat rule enforcement as a chance to build moral reasoning and voluntary compliance, not just obedience. ascd
Co-create a class code of behavior — develop agreements that both students and teacher sign onto. mobile.collierschools
Teach values explicitly and directly — students should hear the words, learn their meanings, identify the behaviors, and practice applying them; purposeful direct instruction beats incidental exposure. ascd
Integrate character into academic content — use literature, history, and current events to examine ethical dilemmas and moral questions; ask “What would you have done?” about characters and historical figures.
Use cooperative learning — team projects build perspective-taking, appreciation of others, and working toward common goals. ascd
Employ varied methods — discussions, role-play, simulations, debates on moral dilemmas, storytelling, and project-based learning help students internalize values.
Teach conflict resolution — give students concrete skills for solving conflicts fairly and without force. ascd
Provide opportunities for moral action — service learning, peer mentoring, tutoring, and community projects let students practice character in real situations tandfonline
Encourage reflection and self-assessment — reflective journals, goal-setting, and student self-evaluation of character growth.
Foster intrinsic motivation — nurture internalization of values rather than relying on extrinsic rewards; avoid over-reliance on prizes for good behavior. tandfonline
Use habituation and consistent routines — regular daily practices reinforce values until they become habits. ejournal.papanda
Catch and name good character — call out and reinforce character traits whenever they appear in books, history, or student behavior. edutopia
WHAT MAKES PROGRAMS EFFECTIVE
CHALLENGES
Competing demands on curriculum time — emphasis on testing and academic performance is identified as one of the main obstacles to creating space for character education. atlantis-press
Teacher preparation gaps — teachers rarely receive specialized training, and lack pedagogical skill and guidelines for integrating character into lessons.
Insufficient resources — limited resources, staffing, and supervision are major structural barriers to comprehensive implementation. al-afkar
Family and community alignment — low parental involvement, differing parenting styles, and weak school–family collaboration are repeatedly cited obstacles. Link
Measurement difficulty — character growth is subjective and difficult to measure; most studies lack validated measures. Link
Mixed evidence of effectiveness — the largest federal evaluation found no evidence the seven programs studied improved student outcomes. Link
Disagreement over core values — the field has no consensus definition of character or which values to teach. Link
Risk of rewarding conformity — “forced formality” approaches target compliance with rules rather than developing students of strong, independent character. files.eric.ed
Overlooking structural influences — the “fix-the-kid” approach treats problems as residing in individuals while ignoring structural drivers of behavior. scispace
Low-quality program design — “cheerleading,” “praise and reward,” and “define and drill” approaches aim for quick behavioral results rather than genuine understanding and commitment. files.eric.ed
Lecture-only delivery — programs built on a “transmittal” theory rely on exhortation and rewards instead of helping students internalize values. scispace
Reliance on isolated lessons — effective character education requires a comprehensive, whole-school approach woven into all phases of school life, not stand-alone lessons. edweek
WHAT NOT TO DO
Don’t run “cheerleading” programs — posters, banners, value-of-the-month assemblies, and upbeat announcements expose students to messages but don’t build commitment. files.eric.ed
Don’t rely on “praise and reward” — catching students being good and trading chits for prizes makes the reward the focus and erodes intrinsic motivation; rewarding virtue can actually decrease students’ intrinsic commitment to it.
Don’t “define and drill” — quizzing students on value definitions like multiplication facts equates memorization with the far more complex capacity to act on values.files.eric.ed
Don’t use “forced formality” — strict uniform compliance with rules of conduct (walking in lines, formal address, standing when adults enter) aims at quick behavioral results, not deep and enduring effects.files.eric.ed
Don’t lecture or moralize — direct instruction in moral principles has little effect; instead engage students in discussion and reflection so they understand values “from the inside out”
Don’t be reactive — waiting for teachable moments rather than deliberately planning character development into lessons and routines is less effective than being intentional and proactive. edweek
Don’t rely on stand-alone lessons — isolated lessons or slogans don’t work; character must be woven into every phase of school life through a comprehensive, whole-school approach. edweek
Don’t reduce discipline to obedience — treating rule enforcement as only compliance misses the chance to build moral reasoning and voluntary commitment. scispace
Don’t overcomplicate materials — straightforward, simple curriculum materials are far more likely to be taught consistently. edweek
Don’t try to “fix the kid” — problems don’t rest solely within individuals; scrutinize the classroom and school structures (e.g., competitive systems that foster cheating) rather than remaking the students. scispace
Don’t assume a dark view of human nature — programs premised on children needing to be controlled into virtue rely on indoctrination rather than developing students as thinkers about values. scispace
Don’t promote uncritical deference to authority — defining values like obedience and respect in ways that demand conformity confuses morality with compliance. scispace
Don’t leave students passive — the best approaches enlist students as active participants in creating a caring and just classroom community, not as recipients of adult-imposed values. files.eric.ed
ARTICLES
Link – ARTICLE (NYU) Outcomes beyond test scores: Social-emotional learning
Link – ARTICLE (APA) Social-emotional learning is under attack
Link – ARTICLE (ASCD) What makes character education programs work?
Link – ARTICLE (ASCD) The return of character education
Link – ARTICLE (ASCD) How character education helps students grow
Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) How to teach character in the classroom
Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) How to teach character online
Link – ARTICLE (IES) Positive action program
Link – ARTICLE (NEMTSS) Character counts program
Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Questions of character development
Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) How to teach elementary students character in the classroom
Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Schools cultivate character development
Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Service learning
Link – ARTICLE (Kohn) How not to teach values: A look at character education
RESEARCH / REPORTS / GUIDE
Link – RESEARCH (Lickona) Character education
Link – RESEARCH (Tandfon) Character education and academic progression
Link – RESEARCH (Tandfon) Redesigning schools for effective character development
Link – REPORT (Jubilee) Character and academic achievement
Link – REPORT (IES) Lessons in character impact evaluation
Link – REPORT (UK) Character education: Reports and resources
THOUGHT LEADERS
Thomas Lickona — developmental psychologist and founding figure of the modern character education movement; defined character as moral knowing, moral feeling, and moral action, and authored the field’s most widely used comprehensive approach. Link
Marvin Berkowitz — University of Missouri–St. Louis scholar who leads the scientific study of character education; with Melinda Bier identified 69 studies of 33 programs with scientific evidence of effectiveness, and co-wrote the field’s most-cited critique of weak practice. Link
Kristján Kristjánsson — deputy director of the Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues at the University of Birmingham; the leading philosophical voice for an Aristotelian, virtue-ethics grounding of character education and author of systematic rebuttals to the field’s critics. Link
Alfie Kohn — the movement’s most prominent critic; his “How Not to Teach Values” reframed the debate by attacking rewards, exhortation, and the “fix-the-kid” orientation, pushing the field toward intrinsic motivation and structural change. Link
Darcia Narvaez — developmental psychologist whose Integrative Ethical Education model critiques traditionalist approaches and grounds character development in social-cognitive science rather than habit formation. repository.mdx.ac
PROGRAMS
Positive Action (Pre-K–12) — the strongest evidence in the field: the only program rated “positive effects” by the federal What Works Clearinghouse in both academics and behavior, with RCTs showing higher test scores, less absenteeism, fewer suspensions, and reduced substance use, violence, and bullying; used by more than 15,000 schools. Link
Character Counts! (K–12) — likely the most widely used character framework in U.S. schools, built on the Six Pillars (trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, fairness, caring, citizenship) and reaching millions of students; evidence is largely district-reported rather than from randomized trials. Link
Second Step (Committee for Children) — one of the most widely adopted social-emotional and character programs in elementary and middle schools; its evidence is mixed — it was among the seven programs in the federal SACD study that showed no overall effects, though other trials report behavior benefits. Link
PATHS (Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies) — a widely used SEL/character curriculum focused on self-control and social problem-solving; one randomized trial found benefits for aggression and social competence, but a large UK trial found no impact on academic attainment. Link
4Rs (Reading, Writing, Respect, and Resolution) — a literature-based program from the Morningside Center that integrates character into language arts; follow-up analyses found positive outcomes for at-risk students (better attendance, grades, and reading scores) even though the federal study overall was null. Link
Leader in Me and Responsive Classroom — two of the most popular schoolwide approaches schools braid into character initiatives, based on the “7 Habits” and cooperative classroom community practices respectively; adoption is widespread but rests more on practitioner endorsement than on randomized evidence. members.character
VIDEO
Link – VIDEO (EduTopia) Teaching about character
DIGITAL TOOLS
ClassDojo — the most widely adopted platform (used in 90% of U.S. schools); teachers award points for skills and values, share photos and updates with families in 190+ languages, and deliver “Big Ideas” SEL content on growth mindset, empathy, and perseverance developed with Stanford’s PERTS Research Center. classdojo
CharacterStrong — a digital environment for delivering social-emotional and character-development instruction with tiered intervention support; its curricula appeared among the programs schools braid into character initiatives. Link
Second Step — the widely used SEL program’s digital platform builds empathy, emotion management, and problem-solving skills from early learning through middle school. secondstep
AIM Buddy Project — a supplemental character curriculum built on the PBS ARTHUR characters; cross-grade buddy pairs work through interactive comics and games on empathy, honesty, forgiveness, generosity, and learning from others. schooldataleadership
Centervention — interactive, gamified scenarios for K–8 students that let them practice empathy, emotional regulation, and problem-solving, with teacher dashboards to track progresseschoolnews
Happify with the Mayerson Academy’s Thriving Learning Communities — an online gaming platform paired with character-strengths science; students take a survey identifying their top-five signature strengths and complete activities reinforcing them. edweek
Wisdom: The World of Emotions — an award-winning game-based app for ages 4–8 teaching emotion vocabulary, regulation strategies, and social skills through interactive stories. f6s
Character Lab — founded by Angela Duckworth; offers free research-based “Playbooks” with step-by-step guidance for teaching perseverance, gratitude, curiosity, and other strengths. eschoolnews
VIA Character Strengths Survey — a free strengths assessment students can take to identify and reflect on their signature character strengths; built into counseling platforms like MaiaLearning. maialearning
Brown, McGrath, Bier, Johnson, & Berkowitz. (2022). A comprehensive meta-analysis of character education programs. Journal of Moral Education.
Dabdoub, J. P., Salgado, D., Bernal, A., Berkowitz, M. W., & Salaverría, A. R. (2024). Redesigning schools for effective character education through leadership: The case of PRIMED Institute and vLACE. Journal of Moral Education, 53(3), 558–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2254510
Detterman, D. K. (2016). Education and intelligence: Pity the poor teacher because student characteristics are more significant than teachers or schools. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, E93. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2016.88
Hamlin, D. (2021). Can a positive school climate promote student attendance? Evidence from New York City. American Educational Research Journal, 58(2), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220924037
Harrison, T., Arthur, J., & Bushby, R. (2023). Outstanding schools: Character education and school improvement. Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues, University of Birmingham. https://www.jubileecentre.ac.uk/project/outstanding-schools/(open in a new window).
Jeynes, W. H. (2019). A meta-analysis on the relationship between character education and student achievement and behavioral outcomes. Education and Urban Society, 51(1), 33–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517747681
Jeynes, W. H. (2019). A meta-analysis on the relationship between character education and student achievement and behavioral outcomes. Education and Urban Society, 51(1), 33–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124517747681
The Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues. (2022). A framework for character education in schools (pp. 1–11). University of Birmingham.
Lee & Gage. (2020). Updating and expanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effects of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports. Psychology in the Schools.
McLoughlin, S., Bartram, R., & Harrison, T. (2026). Character education and academic progression in English schools. Educational Review, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2026.2669614
Oldham, P., & McLoughlin, S. (2026). Character education empirical research: A thematic review and comparative content analysis. Journal of Moral Education, 55(2), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2025.2480185
Pattaro, C. (2016). Character education: Themes and researches. An academic literature review. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 8(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2016-1-2
Pike, M. A., Hart, P., Paul, S. A. S., Lickona, T., & Clarke, P. (2021). Character development through the curriculum: Teaching and assessing the understanding and practice of virtue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1755996
Revell, L. (2002). Children’s responses to character education. Educational Studies, 28(4), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569022000042426
Rigo, P., Davis, B., Redín, D. M., Liu, Y., Wang, C., Chen, J., & Dai, J. (2023). Development and status of moral education research: Visual analysis based on knowledge graph. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1079955
Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2019). The impact of signature character strengths interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(4), 1179–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-018-9990-2
Seider, S., Gilbert, J. K., Novick, S., & Gomez, J. (2013). The role of moral and performance character strengths in predicting achievement and conduct among urban middle school students. Teachers College Record, 115(8), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500807
Spohrer, K. (2021). Resilience, self-discipline and good deeds – examining enactments of character education in English secondary schools. Pedagogy Culture & Society, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.2007986
Vincent, C. (2018). Civic virtue and values teaching in a ‘post-secular’ world. Theory & Research in Education, 16(2), 226–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878518774128
Wu, Spreckelsen, & Cohen. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effect of values affirmation on academic achievement. Journal of Social Issues.