Teacher Practical Guidance:
Student Effort (Engagement)
Category: Student
Rank Order
Effect Size
Achievement Gain %
How-To Strategies
BENEFITS
- Academic outcomes – Engaged students typically earn higher grades, score better on standardized tests, and show deeper understanding of material.
- Cognitive and thinking skills –Engagement is associated with stronger critical thinking, problem solving, and the ability to apply knowledge in new situations.
- Motivation and persistence – Higher engagement increases intrinsic motivation, curiosity, and the joy of learning, making students more willing to tackle challenging tasks.
- Social‑emotional development – Engagement supports the development of social and emotional competencies, including collaboration, communication, and relationship skills. link
- Perseverance helps students stick with multi-step problems, complex texts, and long-term projects.
- Working hard through difficulty teaches students that their abilities can grow, which supports a growth mindset and greater intrinsic motivation.
- Perseverance and sustained effort help students develop resilience, problem-solving, and self-regulation, which are critical for success in work and adult life. link
HOW TO
- Create classroom culture celebrating failure and “not yet.”
- Goals are clear (they know what they need to accomplish right now)
- Feedback is immediate (they can tell how they are doing and adjust quickly).
- They teach the teacher – what and how they are doing something.
- Teach students how to ask for help.
- Identifying and helping them understand the journey to success and the steps to achieve success.
- Use of success criteria for lessons – create with students.
- Teach students how to give and receive feedback.
- Creating student responsibilities: school jobs, tutoring, student-led conferences etc.
- Challenges seen as opportunities – “I just haven’t figured it out yet.”
- Use KWL when lesson planning.
- Teach students how to engage in error detection.
- Daily problem solving tasks.
- Differentiated instruction.
- Small group instruction
- Use of graphic organizers and visual cues
- Games
- Tournaments
- Jigsaw method link
- Reciprocal teaching link
- STEM activities and lab experiences
- Understand Golem effect; Matthew effect; Pygmalion effect
- Growth mindset student inventory assessment usage.
- The solution, according to Palo Freire (2018) is for “teachers to be partners in learning with students…the teachers cannot think for the students; they must pose questions and problems with the student becoming the teacher and teacher the student” Dweck (2019)
TYPES OF ENGAGEMENT
- Behavioral – participating in activities, attentive
- Emotional – affective attitudes, sense of belonging
- Cognitive – intellectually stimulating Fredricks (2016)
TEACHER QUESTIONS
- “If it was easy you would not be learning anything new.”
- “Let’s break it down into smaller chunks.”
- “Describe the progress you have made?”
- “What part is hard for you? How can you get better at that?”
- “Tell me how I can help?”
- “Teach me what you have learned and can do now.” Bandura (1993)
CHALLENGES
- Many students arrive with low academic confidence, learned helplessness, or a belief that effort does not pay off, so pushing “try harder” can feel hollow or even shaming if they do not yet see success.
- Emotional, mental health, and wellness issues: Stress, anxiety, physical fatigue, and other wellness challenges reduce capacity to participate.
- Passive, teacher-centered methods: Heavy reliance on lecture and “sit and get” instruction is consistently cited as a major barrier.
- Low cognitive demand or lack of challenge: When work feels too easy or repetitive.
- Limited relevance and authenticity: Students are less engaged when they cannot see how learning connects to real problems.
- Class size, time, and space constraints: Large classes, fixed seating, and short periods make it harder to use active, collaborative, or discussion-based methods.
- Resistance to change: Both students and educators may resist new, more interactive approaches. link
- They are unlikely to persist if they fear ridicule for mistakes or do not trust that the classroom is worth investing in.
- Perseverance is hard to foster when work is chronically too easy, too hard, or perceived as meaningless.
- A heavy emphasis on grit can shift attention away from structural barriers (poverty, bias, language access, disability supports) and imply students would succeed “if they just tried harder.” link
WHAT NOT TO DO
- Too much teacher talk – lecture destroys interest and involvement. Most students have a very limited attention span, and teacher-talk leads to boredom and acting out.
- Lack of student centered and hands-on activities – When students are busy with hands-on activities, they are too engaged to misbehave or get bored. They need to make choices, do things, and participate with all their senses.
- Failure to understand development – teachers need to understand the developmental differences between how they think, and how students think.
- Teachers who possess no joy or belief in the importance of teaching.
- Students who possess a belief they are not learners or can’t learn something. When the language of the classroom needs to change from do your work, to focus on learning. Learn and learning are the purpose of school – not work. use learn and learning when discussing tasks (not work).
- Students who participate in “busy-work” that has limited relevance (cutting and pasting is not learning). Christensen (2012)
- Avoid praising “grit” in the abstract – Don’t just say “good job being so gritty” without linking it to specific, observable actions or strategies.
- Don’t celebrate effort when a student has been working ineffectively; distinguish effort that’s productive from effort that’s misdirected.
- Avoid pushing students to “stick with” tasks that are misaligned with ability, interest, or purpose.
-
Don’t tell students “you just need more grit” when barriers are structural (under‑resourced supports, chronic overload, poverty‑linked instability).
- Avoid jumping in to solve the first sign of frustration; students need productive struggle to build real perseverance.
-
Don’t reduce tasks until they’re always easy; low‑threshold, low‑challenge work undercuts the “stretch” needed for resilience.
-
Don’t equate quitting with character failure; sometimes disengaging from an unproductive task is a rational and growth‑aligned decision.
-
Avoid phrases like “quitters never win” that pathologize helping kids walk away from activities that don’t fit their strengths or values.
- Don’t praise only “you’ve been working so hard” without naming concrete strategies (“you broke this into smaller steps,” “you asked for help early”). link
How-To Resources
ARTICLE
Link – ARTICLE (Young) A new understanding of effort
Link – ARTICLE (Educ Hub) 7 strategies to increase self-efficacy
Link – ARTICLE (Edutopia) True Grit
Link – ARTICLE (Edutopia) Resources on GRIT
Link – ARTICLE (Edutopia) Growing students’ mistake tolerance
Link – ARTICLE (Edutopia) Teaching grit
Link – ARTICLE (PositivePsychology) How to Nurture a Growth Mindset: 8 best activities
Link – ARTICLE (UW) How to build self-efficacy
Link – ARTICLE (Harvard) Resilience
Link – ARTICLE (Weber) Stop comparing your child to others…
Link – ARTICLE (Cario) How to help children stop comparing themselves to others
Link – ARTICLE (CreativeEducator) 50 activities and projects for Middle School
Link – ARTICLE (MSTeachingResources) 32 projects
Link – ARTICLE (Veritas) 15 engineering projects for MS
Link – ARTICLE (MathResources) 180 daily MS math word problems
Link – ARTICLE (Myers) 11 tips on building self-esteem in children
Link – ARTICLE (AMIE) Critique GRIT
Link – ARTICLE (BigLifeJournal) 9 Activities to build GRIT
Link – ARTICLE (Press) GRIT Pie
Link – ARTICLE (AffectiveL) GRIT strategies for classroom
Link – ARTICLES (EducWeek) Student Engagement
Link – ARTICLE (EducWeek) 5 Ways to Inspire Love of Learning
Link – ARTICLE (CarolDweck) Growth Mindset
Link – ARTICLE (DN) The power of Embracing Mistakes
Link – ARTICLE (GGSC) Why we should embrace mistakes in school
Link – ARTICLE (UC) What’s wrong with GRIT?
Link – ARTICLE (DeweySoc) The limits and advantages of teaching GRIT in schools
RESEARCH / REPORT / GUIDE
Link – RESEARCH (ScienceDirect) Who perseveres in school?
Link – REPORT (Hechinger) Issues with promoting grit
Link – GUIDE (Mindset) How to develop growth mindset
Link – GUIDE (Students at the Center) Growth, Engagement & Responsiveness
Link – GUIDE (Transforming Educ) Self-efficacy tool kit
Link – GUIDE (Bluegrass Center) Best practices guide for supporting student self-efficacy
Link – SCALE (Duckworth) Grit Scale
TRAINING / PROGRAM
Link – TRAINING (Grace) GRIT Training
Link – TRAINING (GRIT) The GRIT Project
Link – TRAINING (Blueprints) “ABC Project”
Link – PROGRAM (Get Grit) Grades K-6
Link – PROGRAM (Kid GRIT) Grades K-12
Project based learning (PBL)
Problem based learning link
Inquiry based learning (IBL) link
5E model link
Universal design for learning (UDL) link
Student choice making – the plan-do-review sequence
Cooperative learning link
Competency based instruction(CBI) link
Outcome based education (OBE) link
VIDEO
Link – VIDEO (Carol Dweck) Growth Mindset
Link – VIDEO (Caturia) Teacher Estimate of Achievement
Link – VIDEO (C. Dweck) A study on praise and mindsets
Link – VIDEO (Rosenthal) Pygmalion Effect
Link – VIDEO (YouTube) Pygmalion Effect and Positive Expectations
Link – VIDEO (Knowledge one) Pygmalion and Golem Effect
Link – VIDEO (Productivity) The Golem Effect
Link – VIDEO (Corwin) Removing Labels
Link – VIDEO (YouTube) Embrace your mistakes
Link- VIDEO (YouTube) Growth mindset embrace mistakes
DIGITAL
Digital tools can support effort when they make progress visible, normalize productive struggle, and scaffold reflection and self-regulation.
Gamified quiz and practice tools such as , Quizizz, or Classcraft can use levels, badges, and progress bars to reward sustained effort.
Link – ARTICLE (TG) Digital tools and growth mindset
Digital journals or portfolios like or Microsoft/Google Sites allow students to document drafts, revisions, and reflections over time, helping them see how effort leads to growth.
Link – ARTICLE (EveryLearner) GRIT tools
Simple project and task boards like or Miro (or Jamboard alternatives) help students break big goals into small, trackable steps; moving tasks from “To Do” to “Done”
Link – ARTICLE (Strobel) Engage students in digital era
Link – WEBSITE (Mindset) What is Growth Mindset
References
Anderson, Gary. Advocacy Leadership: Toward a Post-Reform Agenda in Education. (New York: Routledge, 2009),47.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
Denrell, J., et.al (2023). Underdogs and one hit wonders: When is overcoming adversity impressive? Management Science.
Donker, de Boer, Kostons, van Ewijk, & Van der Werf (2015). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review.
Dornyei, Z (2001) New themes and approaches to motivation research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 779-792.
Duckworth, A. (2016). GRIT: The power of passion and perseverance. Scribner. Link
Dufor, R. (2016). Learning by doing (3rd edition). Solution Tree.
Dweck, C.S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Dweck, C.S. (2008). Brainology: Transforming students’ motivation to learn. Independent School, 67(2), 110-119.
Dweck, C.S. (2019). Mindset: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481-496.
Fong, Krou, Johnston-Ashton, Hoff, Lin, & Gonzales (2021). LASSI’s great adventure: A meta-analysis of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory and academic outcomes. Educational Research Review.
Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed (50th Anniversary ed., M. Bergan Ramos , Trans.) Bloomsbury. Link
Friedman, T., & Mandelbaum, M. (2011). That used to be us. Farrar.
Gladwell, M. (2013). David and Goliath. Little & Brown Link
Grant, A. (2023). Hidden potential: The science of achieving great things. Viking
Hattie, J. et.al. (2024). The illustrated guide to visible learning: An introduction to what works best in schools. Corwin Press.
Hockey, G. R. J. (2011). A motivational control theory of cognitive fatigue. In P. L. Ackerman (Ed.), Decade of Behavior/Science Conference. Cognitive fatigue: Multidisciplinary perspectives on current research and future applications (p. 167–187). American Psychological Association.
Jachimowicz, J., et al. (2018). Why grit requires perseverance and passion to positively predict performance. PNAS 115, (40). 9980-9985
Kumar (1991). A Meta-analysis of the Relationship between Science Instruction and Student Engagement. Educational Review.
Lindstrom, Chow, Zimmerman, Zhao, Settanni, & Ellison (2021). A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Relation Between Engagement and Achievement in Early Childhood Research. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education.
Maiers, A. (2012). Classroom Habitudes. Solution Tree. Link
Mattos, M., et al (2016). Best practices at tier 1: Daily differentiation for effective instruction. Solution Tree.
Pekrun, R. et.al. (2017). Emotions at School. Routledge Press.
Perplexity. (2024). *Perplexity.ai* (AI chatbot). https://www.perplexity.ai/
Quin (2017). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher–student relationships and student engagement: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research.
Sun, Wang, & Zhang (2021). A meta-analysis of the relationship between behavioral engagement and academic achievement. Journal of Open Learning.
Taylor, B., Duke, N. (2013). Handbook of Effective Literacy Instruction: Research-Based K-8. Guilford Press.
Wong, Liem, Chan, & Datu (2023). Student engagement and its association with academic achievement and subjective well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology.
Yeager, D., et. al. (2022). Teachers mindsets help explain where a growth mindset intervention does and doesn’t work. Psychological Science, 33. 18-32
Yeager, D., et. al. (2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature. 573 (7774) 364-369.
Student Effort (Engagement)
DEFINITIONS
Effort: in student learning is best defined as the intentional energy students invest in doing the mental and behavioral work required to learn, especially when it is challenging. Effort is not just “time spent”; it is purposeful persistence and cognitive engagement directed at mastering a goal.
The process by which a learner uses tactics—such as mood management, self-talk, persistence, self-reinforcement, or attribution of success to effort—in order to achieve a particular goal. Refers to a student’s belief and attitudes toward their own capabilities to achieve academic success, persist, and learn. High self-efficacy reflects student confidence in the ability to exert control over motivation, behavior, and achievement.
Students with a “Growth Mindset” and “Grit” believe they can learn if they persist. If they find it difficult to learn something or achieve the level of success they expect, they don’t blame themselves, the task or the teacher, they recognize that they “just have to work harder and stay-with-it” and they will succeed.” link
Engagement encompasses emotional, behavioral, and cognitive aspects of students’ participation in education.
Emotional Engagement: This aspect of student engagement relates to students’ feelings about their instructors, classrooms, and sense of belonging. It reflects the emotional connection students have with the learning environment and their peers.
Behavioral Engagement: Behavioral engagement focuses on how attentive and invested students are in their classes. It includes observable behaviors such as attending class, listening attentively, participating in discussions, and following rules and directions.
Cognitive Engagement: refers to students’ cognitive investment in their learning process. It involves students’ participation, commitment to their studies, curiosity, optimism, motivation, and interest in the material being taught.
GRIT & Growth Mindset: Dweck (2006) made the terms “Growth Mindset vs. Fixed Mindset” popular. A student having a growth mindset believes that one can change and ability is not fixed. Students and teachers who generalize the growth mindset use the terms “I will” and “not yet.” Duckworth (2016) expanded on the growth mindset using the term “Grit” defined as strenuously working toward challenges, maintaining effort and interest despite failure and adversity. Perseverance of effort has been shown to be a better predictor or grades than “ability.” All teachers want students who say to themselves and others: “I just haven’t figured it out yet.”
DATA
-
26 Meta analysis reviews
-
1,460 Research studies
-
2 million + students in studies
-
5 Confidence level. Hattie (2023) p. 88
QUOTES
“If children by age 8, do not feel they are successfully part of the school culture, their commitment to school, learning, and achievement expectations diminish dramatically” (the Matthew Effect). Hattie (2023) p. 63
“Students need to feel that they belong, are liked, and have some control over learning. They also need to feel success in completing tasks. Self-efficacy (based on self-determination theory) requires autonomy, relatedness, and competence.” Taylor & Duke (2013) p. 22
“Educators must do more that give students the chance to learn – they must align their practices to promote learning. They must reject the fixed mindset that attributes accomplishments to innate ability or dispositions that cannot be enhanced. They must instead embrace the growth mindset: the belief that students can cultivate their ability and talents through their efforts as effective teachers.” Dufor (2016) p. 55
“People have one of the two mental predispositions toward intelligence: a fixed or growth mindset. Those with a fixed mindset believe that people are intelligent or not and this predicts potential. Those with a growth mindset believe that intelligence can increase over-time as the brain changes and grows through the process of near-plasticity.” Mattos (2016) p. 33
“If you get tired, learn to rest, not quit”
“Go the extra mile…it’s never crowded”
“Promise you will always remember: Your braver than you believe, stronger than you seem, and smarter than you think.” Winnie the Pooh
“Persistence trumps talent. We need students who are self-confident and resilient. To be successful today requires courage to overcome fear and creativity to see the world in new ways. You develop the self-confidence to be creative by surviving and learning from failure. Failure produces new learning. Creativity is self-propelled, self-motivated, and unlocked.” Friedman (2011) p. 147
“Grit is a combination of perseverance, tenacity, self-discipline, and curiosity. It is more important for success than out-dated measures of IQ. The job of the teacher should be to develop this potential, rather than having to waste time preparing students for tests and then judging each child’s achievement relative to others.” Wagner (2020) p. 75
“To get students to believe it, we have to act as if we [their teachers] believe it ourselves in all the daily interactions of class instruction and class business that make up the emotional environment. And we have to create structures and routines that would exist only if we believe our students could be successful at a proficient level” Saphier (2017).
“If it’s not working, it’s not the students fault…it’s my fault. I’ve just not identified what to do yet.”
“The major aim of schooling should be to mess with the predictability of who succeeds and who fails. History, zip code, and IQ tests should not be a determination of success. Indeed the essence of equity involves removing the predictability of success or failure.” Hattie (2023)
“It is important for teachers to maintain a degree of uncertainty and extensively seek and process information about students before making judgements” Sudkamp (2012)
“The question is not ‘do teachers have expectations but, do they have false or misleading expectations’? Children know when they are treated differently by teachers due to expectations, and are quite accurate in their assessments on how teachers view them.” Hettleman (2019)
