Teacher Practical Guidance:

Micro-Teaching (Video Review of Lessons)

Category: Technology

Rank Order

6

Effect Size

0.99

Achievement Gain %

33

How-To Strategies

BENEFITS


  • Micro-teaching lets teachers practice discrete skills such as questioning, classroom management, explanation, and use of audiovisual aids in short, targeted segments.

 

  • Sessions typically include peer and supervisor feedback plus video review, giving concrete, specific evidence of strengths and growth areas.

 

  • The “teach–critique–re-teach” cycle promotes reflective practice and sustained improvement rather than one-off evaluation.

 

  • Studies report increases in self-confidence and willingness to try innovative methods after several micro-teaching sessions.

 

  • Improved instructional techniques that in turn enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. link

 

 

HOW TO


  • Involves delivering a mini-lesson, typically lasting between 5 to 20 minutes, to a small group of peers or students who may not be the teacher’s regular class. The session is often recorded, allowing the teacher to review their performance later. This process includes:

 

  • Preparation: The teacher selects a specific skill or topic to focus on.

 

  • Teaching: The lesson is delivered to a small group.

 

  • Feedback: After the session, peers and mentors provide constructive feedback based on observations and the recorded video.

 

  • Reflection: The process encourages critical thinking about teaching practices, fostering continuous improvement.  link

 

 

RECORDING HINTS


Software:

  • IMovie app on IPad

 

  •  ShowMe app on IPad – which is interactive whiteboard app

 

  •  Adobe View app to create cross between slide show, music and video

 

  •  Recording software such as Panopto (often used in Univ settings) Link

 

  •  Screen casting software  such as Explain Everything (to put on digital whiteboard) Link

 

  • When making instructional videos – chunk instruction (6 minutes long) in short bursts…too long students will not stay engaged

 

  • When using video to self-assess, review with prepared rubric to provide focus to assessment

 

  • Video portfolios are frequently used for teacher development purposes, for hiring, licensing, and certification purposes. link

 

 

CHALLENGES


  • Artificial environment: Sessions occur in highly controlled, small-group settings that lack the complexity, diversity, and unpredictability of real classrooms.

 

  • Narrow skill focus: Emphasis on isolated skills (e.g., questioning, reinforcement) can fragment practice and under prepare teachers for integrating multiple skills simultaneously.

 

  • Short time frames: Very brief lessons make it difficult to develop, sustain, and assess learning sequences.

 

  • Performance anxiety: Being observed and evaluated by peers and supervisors can heighten stress, leading to forgotten steps.

 

  • Lesson planning and clarity: Common issues include unclear or overloaded objectives, mismatched activities and outcomes.

 

  • Time-intensive structure: Effective micro-teaching requires cycles of planning, teaching, video review, feedback, and reteaching, which are difficult to schedule.

 

  • Limited opportunities for re-teaching.

 

  • Need for experts and supervisors.

 

  • Cost and logistics: Video recording, dedicated micro-teaching rooms, and technology.  link

 

 

 

WHAT NOT TO DO


  • Do not start without explicit objectives for the trainee (what skill they are practicing) and for the session (what success looks like).

 

  • Do not overload the schedule; cramming in too many micro-lessons leaves no time for debrief.

 

  • Do not “wing it” as an observer; arriving without a clear observation lens or tool leads to vague, unhelpful feedback.

 

  • Do not interrupt to correct every misstep in real time.

 

  • Do not jump straight to judgement (“good/bad lesson”) before asking the candidate to self-assess.

 

  • Do not give generic praise or criticism like “great job” or “not engaging” without concrete evidence and next steps.

 

  • Do not skip or rush the debrief.

 

  • Do not compare candidates publicly. link

How-To Resources

ARTICLE


Link – ARTICLE (Edutopia) Using video in teacher PD

 

Link – ARTICLE (Campus) What is Micro-Teaching?

 

Link – ARTICLE (UK) Micro-teaching defined

 

Link – ARTICLE (Visible Learning) Microteaching

 

Link – ARTICLE (Care Skills) What is Micro-Teaching?

 

Link – ARTICLE (Wikipedia) What is Micro-Teaching?

 

Link – ARTICLE (Edutopia) 5-step guide to making instructional videos

 

Link – ARTICLE (Insight) Benefits of Video in Teacher Evaluation and PD

 

Link – ARTICLE (OEDB) 4 great IPad apps for creating educational videos

 

Link – ARTICLE (U of Kan) Video Self-Modeling

 

Link – ARTICLE (Knowledge A.) What is micro-teaching?

 

Link – ARTICLE (AC) Common facilitation mistakes

 

Link – ARTICLE (Brooks) Top tips for successful micro-teaching

 

Link – ARTICLE (FE) Top 4 micro-teaching tips

 

Link – ARTICLE (SCRIBD) Micro-teaching: Benefits and limitations

 

 

 

GUIDE / REPORT


Link – GUIDE (Florida Tech) How to Video Self-Assess

 

Link – GUIDE / VIDEO (Pianta) My Teaching Partner – UVA

 

Link – GUIDE (NY) Teacher Self-Assessment Guide

 

 

 

VIDEO


Link – VIDEO (Youtube) Micro-Teaching: Graphic Novel

 

Link – VIDEO (YouTube) Power of micro-teaching

 

Link – VIDEO (YouTube) Delivering effective micro-teaching session

 

Link – VIDEO (YouTube) How to create successful micro-teach

 

 

DIGITAL


  • Panopto – video platform link

 

  • GoReact – response to video sharing link

 

  • Vosaic – video analysis link

 

  • WeVideo – peer review sharing link

 

  • Screencastify – short video link

 

  • Google workspace – store video link

 

  • Microsoft Onedrive – store video link

 

Link – WEBSITE (Educators Technology) Inventory of tools & Apps

References

Abendroth, Mark; Golzy, John B.; O’Connor, Eileen A. (1 December 2011). “Self-Created Youtube Recordings of Microteachings: Their Effects upon Candidates’ Readiness for Teaching and Instructors’ Assessment”. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 40 (2): 141–159. doi:10.2190/ET.40.2.e. S2CID 56612007.

 

 

Allen DW, Wang W. Beijing: Xinhua Press; 1996. Microteaching. []

 

Applebee AN. Microteaching, Component skills and the training of teachers, an evaluation of a research and development project. Br J Educ Technol. 1976;7:35–43. []

 

Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37

 

Blomberg, G., et al (2014). Understanding video as a tool for teacher education: Investigating instructional strategies integrating video to promote reflection. Instructional Science, 41 (3) Link

 

Beck, R., et al (2005). Teachers’ self-assessment of the effects of formative and summative portfolios on professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(3) Link

 

Brame, C. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning. CBE Life Sciences Education. 15(4). Link

 

Brent R, Wheatley EA, Thomson WS. Videotaped microteaching: Bridging the gap from the university to the classroom. Teach Educ. 1996;31:238–47. []

 

Brophy, J. (Ed.) (2004). Advances in research on teaching: Vol. 10 – Using video in teacher education. Oxford, Elsevier.

 

Butcher (1981) An experimental investigation of the effectiveness of a value claim strategy unit for use in teacher education (Unpublished M.A. Macquarie University Sydney

 

Calandra, B., et al (2008). An exploratory study of digital video-editing as a tool for teacher preparation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2)

 

Clinton, J.M., Hattie, J (2014). Teachers as evaluators: An empowerment evaluation approach. In Fertterman, et al. (Eds.), Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-Assessment, Evaluation Capacity Building, and accountability. SAGE. Link

 

Cruickshank DR, Bainier D, Cruz J, Jr, Giebelhaus C, McCullough JD, Metcalf KM. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa; 1996. Preparing America’s Teachers. []

 

Elliot J. A microteaching experiment at MEDUNSA. S Afr Med J. 1982;62:868–70. [PubMed] []

 

Fernandez L Maria. Investigating how and what prospective teachers learn through microteaching lesson study. Teach Teach Educ. 2010;26(2):351–362. []

 

Funmi A Amobi, Irwin L. Implementing on-campus microteaching to elicit preservice teachers’ reflection on teaching actions, Fresh perspective on an established practice. J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2009;9:27–34. []

 

Hansford BC. Microteaching, feedback, dogmatism, and nonverbal perceptiveness. J Psychol. 1977;95:231–5. [PubMed] []

 

Koetje, K. (2020). Video analysis in educator preparation and its impact on teacher performance assessment. Educational Dissertations (57) Link

 

Madike Francis U. Teacher preparation and student achievement, an experimental comparison of microteaching with a traditional approach. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1980;72:866–874.[]

 

Morin, K., et al (2019). A systematic review of single-case research on video analysis as PD for special educators. Journal of Special Education, 53(1) Link

 

Pailliotet, A. (1995). I never saw that before: A deeper view of video analysis in teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 35(2). Link

 

Perplexity (2024). *Perplexity.ai* (AI chatbot). https://www.perplexity.ai/

 

Ramesh, A. (2013). Microteaching: An Efficient technique for learning effective teaching. 2013 Feb; 18(2): 158–163

 

Singh LC, Sharma RD. New Delhi: Department of Teacher Education NCERT; 1987. Micro-teaching – Theory and Practice. []

 

Yeany & Padilla (1986). Training science teachers to utilize better teaching strategies: A research synthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

 

Zeichner, K. & Wray, S. (2001) The teaching portfolio in US teacher education programs: what we know and what we need to know. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 613–621.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Micro-Teaching (Video Review of Lessons)

DEFINITION 

Micro-teaching: A technique in which a teacher delivers a short, recorded lesson that is then analyzed by the teacher and/or other teachers and leaders for the purposes of improvement. The lessons are usually videotaped to assist with the subsequent analysis. link

Micro-teaching is a focused teacher training technique that allows educators to refine their teaching skills through short, controlled practice sessions. Developed in the early 1960s by Dwight W. Allen at Stanford University, this method has become a staple in teacher education programs worldwide.

Micro-teaching involves delivering a mini-lesson, typically lasting between 5 to 20 minutes, to a small group of peers or students who may not be the teacher’s regular class. The session is often recorded, allowing the teacher to review their performance later. This process includes:

  1. Preparation: The teacher selects a specific skill or topic to focus on.

  2. Teaching: The lesson is delivered to a small group.

  3. Feedback: After the session, peers and mentors provide constructive feedback based on observations and the recorded video.

DATA

  • 6 Meta analysis studies

  • 435 Research studies

  • 39,920 Students in studies

  • 4 Confidence level.   Hattie (2023) p. 393

QUOTES

 

“When teachers engage in video analysis (of themselves) they are effective regardless of the length of the video, the number of interventions, and when feedback is received.” Morin (2019)

 

“Relying on in-the-moment awareness or memory alone can be quite limiting and subjective, and even at odds with reality. When a teacher can watch the same clip through various lenses, such as with the focus of building classroom rapport, linking prior knowledge, student-to-student interactions, or distinguishing the types of verbal feedback given, different aspects may be noticed while reducing the cognitive demand for each viewing. ” Koetje (2020)

 

 

“Video analysis can lead to deeper reflection of one’s efforts because it allows for the multiplicity of access by self and others to the same scenario. Teacher educators want to foster this kind of deep reflection in teacher candidates so that these ways of thinking will transfer to their classroom behaviors” Beck (2005)

 

 

“Video analysis offers a bridge to theory. It can take the complex practice of teaching and allow stakeholders to focus on one or two priorities at a time. By selecting a focus question, video provides a bridge based upon the declarative knowledge and research-based principles that leads to learning and unlearning.” Clinton (2014)

 

 

“Bandura (1982) noticed the often-incompatible nature between human knowledge and human behaviors. Video analysis offers coherence between knowledge and teachers’ own daily instructional practice in context, so that teachers may form specific goals.” Koetje (2020)

 

 

“We must always seek the truth in our opponents error and error in our own truths.” Reinhold Niebuhr

 

 

“Lowest level of terror is self-report.” Diane Talo

 

 

 

Zeichner and Wray (2001) stated that the portfolio encourages student teachers to think more deeply about their teaching and about subject matter content, to become more conscious of the theories and assumptions that guide their practices, and to develop a greater desire to engage in collaborative dialogues about teaching.” (p. 614)

 

 

 

“Video portfolio’s foster continuous self-assessment, personal growth and heightened self-awareness.” Beck (2005)