Teacher Practical Guidance:
Principal & School Leadership
Category: External
Rank Order
Effect Size
Achievement Gain %
How-To Strategies
BENEFITS
Impact on Student Achievement: Linked with higher student achievement.
-
Associated with better attendance and fewer exclusionary discipline practices.
-
Can yield the equivalent of several additional months of learning each year compared to less effective leadership.
Stronger Teaching and Professional Growth: Establishes and protects high-quality instructional practices.
-
Sets clear expectations and provides ongoing, actionable feedback.
-
Aligns professional learning to school goals and student needs.
-
Builds teacher capacity, leading to more effective instruction.
Positive School Culture and Climate: Intentionally shapes a safe, inclusive, and collaborative environment.
-
Increases teacher morale and sense of efficacy.
-
Strengthens student engagement and sense of belonging.
-
Creates a shared vision and purpose across the school.
Teacher Retention and Talent Development: Attracts and retains effective teachers.
-
Reduces burnout and turnover through support and recognition.
-
Provides coaching and mentoring that grow teacher-leaders.
-
Develops a pipeline for future leadership within the school.
Effective Use of Data and Resources: Uses data systematically to monitor progress and identify gaps.
-
Tailors interventions to student and teacher needs based on evidence.
-
Aligns budgets, schedules, and staffing with instructional priorities.
-
Ensures that resources support the school’s vision and goals.
Resilience in Times of Crisis: Maintains learning continuity during disruptions or crises.
-
Adapts quickly to new modes of instruction (e.g., remote or hybrid).
-
Sustains communication and relationships with students and families.
-
Helps staff navigate uncertainty with clarity and stability.
Community Trust and Engagement: Builds trust with families and the broader community.
-
Secures additional resources and partnerships to support students.
-
Makes the school more responsive to local needs and priorities.
-
Expands learning opportunities beyond the classroom.
HOW TO
- Anchor your work in learning: Define a clear, shared vision focused on student learning and equity, not just compliance or test scores.
-
Set a small number of measurable goals (attendance, achievement, belonging, SEL) and align initiatives to them.
-
Regularly use school-level and classroom data to check progress and adjust, rather than waiting for annual test results.
- Lead instruction, not just operations: Spend time in classrooms weekly with short, focused observations tied to an agreed “instructional look-for” tool.
-
Provide timely, bite-sized feedback and coaching to teachers, connecting it to specific evidence-based practices (e.g., formative assessment, explicit modeling, cooperative learning).
-
Use staff meetings and PLCs for learning (looking at student work, planning, rehearsing strategies), not just announcements.
- Use data the way researchers do: Build simple data routines: identify a problem, examine multiple data sources, generate a hypothesis, test an intervention, and study the effect (improvement science).
-
Look beyond averages to disaggregate data by student group, course, or teacher to reveal inequities and bright spots.
-
Make data conversations safe and inquiry-oriented (“What’s going on here?” “What might we try?”) instead of evaluative or punitive.
- Choose and implement evidence-based practices: Select strategies and programs with strong research backing and clear logic for why they should work with your students (not just “this is popular”).
-
Plan for implementation: training, coaching, materials, time, and how you will monitor fidelity and impact over time.
-
Start small (e.g., a pilot team or grade), learn from implementation, then scale with adjustments based on evidence.
- Develop people through ongoing learning: Provide job-embedded PD: co-planning, lesson study, peer observation, and coaching cycles around specific, research-based practices.
-
Match PD to identified student needs (e.g., writing, reading comprehension, behavior) and to the evidence-based practices you’ve chosen.
-
Grow teacher-leaders and leadership teams so improvement work is distributed, not dependent on one person.
- Build a collaborative, inclusive culture: Model empathy, psychological safety, and respect; create norms so staff can surface problems without blame.
-
Intentionally include voices of marginalized students and families in planning and evidence reviews (surveys, focus groups, advisory groups).
-
Celebrate learning gains and effective practices openly to reinforce what is working.
- Attend to student well-being: Recognize that academic success and mental health are intertwined; prioritize whole-child supports as core work, not add-ons.
-
Coordinate evidence-based SEL and mental health interventions, and ensure staff have training to recognize and respond to student needs.
-
Monitor indicators like behavior referrals, attendance, and climate surveys as seriously as academic data.
- Continuously grow as a leader: Engage in your own ongoing learning about leadership, instruction, and equity (reading, networks, coaching).
-
Seek feedback from staff, students, and families on your leadership and use it to refine your practice.
-
Treat leadership as iterative: test ideas, study impact, keep what works, and abandon what doesn’t—just as you expect teachers to do. link
1. Develops with staff a shared narrative of the school.
2. A deep sense of self-awareness, strengths and limitations.
3. Build strong relationships with all teachers recognizing collective and individual strengths (Positive Core) and establishes teacher-centric instructional leadership team.
4. Create a safe, inviting school culture that fosters a sense of belonging, trust and caring.
5. Demonstrate a love of learning and understands what they need to learn.
6. Build a collaborative culture where all staff learn from each other in PLC, MTSS and on-going job embedded micro-learning opportunities.
7. Is an active learner with team in searching for and learning from research and evidence based resources (Teachingstrategylibrary.org).
8. Sets school goals collaboratively building on strengths, and seeks “gold standard” implementation.
9. Provide supporting processes and structures to assist teachers; works incrementally and creates small victories.
10. Become proficient in leading the collective to maximize this impact (Collective Ownership).
11. Know how to effectively implement, evaluate. and improve the impact of interventions and change processes across the school.
12. Understand when to bring in expertise to “upskill and upscale” their teachers in achieving their goals.
13. Creates with teachers, SMART goals with realistic timelines and resources to support success.
14. Inform and keep parents aware of the “language of learning” in school.
15. Understand the the barriers and key enablers of learning for students and teachers.
16. Develop skills as effective problem framer who listens carefully and withhold judgement.
17. Asks question, encourages reflection, and demonstrates humility as leader and learner.
18. Celebrate small successes and maintain focus with validity and fidelity. Wiliam (2016
SUCCESSFUL CHANGE TIPS
- establish a sense of urgency
- build a powerful coalition
- promote and communicate a vision
- define clear criteria
- remove obstacles to the vision
- audit existing practices and beliefs
- choose evidence-based solutions
- create short-term wins
- celebrate successes
- make improvement the new normal. Link
SCHOOL LEADER CHALLENGES
School leaders face a mix of instructional, political, and personal challenges that make the role demanding even for highly skilled principals.
Instructional and student needs: Meeting increasingly diverse student needs (language, disability, trauma, poverty) while still raising achievement for all students.
-
Addressing post‑pandemic learning loss, chronic absenteeism, and student mental health concerns that directly affect engagement and performance.
People, staffing, and culture: Recruiting and retaining qualified teachers and support staff amid national shortages and competition from other districts.
-
Maintaining morale, collaboration, and a positive culture when staff feel overworked, under-resourced, or skeptical about new initiatives.
Stakeholders and politics: Balancing the expectations of parents, teachers, school boards, central office, and community members who may have conflicting priorities and timelines.
-
Navigating board governance, local politics, and sometimes intense public scrutiny around curriculum, equity, safety, and technology use (including AI).
Resources, facilities, and technology:Leading improvement with tight or shrinking budgets, aging facilities, and inequitable funding across communities.
-
Integrating technology and AI tools wisely despite infrastructure gaps, uneven staff training, and concerns about distraction or misuse.
Role transition and professional learning: Making the shift from classroom or AP to principal, inheriting previous decisions, and leading change with staff who may not yet trust you.
-
Finding high-quality, practical professional development and coaching for themselves, not just for teachers.
Personal well‑being and sustainability:Managing workload, long hours, and crisis response demands that can lead to stress, isolation, and mental health challenges.
-
Maintaining healthy boundaries and work–life balance while feeling responsible for the school’s success 24/7.
WHAT NOT TO DO
- Ignore relationships and listening: Make decisions for teachers, students, and families instead of with them, and shut down dissenting views.
-
Avoid being visible and accessible; stay in your office and rely on email instead of face‑to‑face listening.
- Micromanage and overcontrol: Closely police every lesson, material, and minute, rather than trusting and empowering staff to use their professional judgment.
-
Use monitoring (walkthroughs, work scrutiny, data meetings) primarily to catch errors and enforce compliance, which stifles initiative and raises stress.
- Communicate poorly or not at all: Fail to communicate clearly and consistently about vision, priorities, and decisions, leaving staff to guess what matters.
-
Withhold information or change direction without explanation, which quickly erodes confidence and breeds rumors.
- Chase numbers and neglect culture: Focus narrowly on test scores, rankings, or “board results” while neglecting pedagogy, happy classrooms, and teacher well‑being.
-
Treat school culture as an afterthought, relying on policies and mandates instead of building trust, respect, and collaboration.
- Dismiss feedback and avoid accountability: Ignore or rationalize critical feedback from staff, students, or families instead of examining your own practice.
-
Blame teachers, students, or “the community” for poor results while taking credit when things go well.
- Neglect professional and personal growth: Assume you no longer need coaching, mentoring, or peer support, and try to “go it alone” in the role.
-
Ignore your own emotional needs and boundaries, leading to burnout, reactivity, and inconsistent behavior with staff.
- Compromise ethics and professionalism: Show favoritism, lose your temper, or speak disrespectfully, which teachers identify as hallmarks of ineffective principals.
-
Cut corners on honesty or transparency, damaging credibility; once trust is broken, instructional improvement becomes nearly impossible.
- Fail to lead by example: Expect punctuality, preparation, and professionalism from others while modeling the opposite yourself.
-
Promote values like collaboration or equity but make decisions that contradict those values in practice.link
INEFFECTIVE PRINCIPALS
- Rely on charisma and charm
- View oneself as the “hero or great person”
- Become a cajoler preaching the vision that all should march behind
- Modeling behavior inconsistent with messaging and vision
- Focus on contingent rewards
- Managing by exception
- Generate mistrust through mixed messages. Senge (2000)
How-To Resources
ARTICLES / BOOKS
Link – ARTICLE (Educ Week) Tips for building emotional intelligence
Link – ARTICLE (Educ Week) Admin need emotional intelligence
Link – ARTICLE (WallaceFound) What do I need to know about school leadership
Link – ARTICLE (ELEducation) Leading evidence based strategic improvement
Link – ARTICLE (TeacherToolKit) 5 mistakes I made as a leader
Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Principal project
Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Teachers view of impactful leadership
Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Building a strong leadership team
Link – BOOK (Lipton & Wellman) Learning Focused Supervision
Link – BOOK (Grant) Hidden Potential: The science of achieving great things
Link – BOOK (Kohn) The schools are children deserve
Link – BOOK (Marzano) School leadership that works
Link – BOOK (Robinson) Creative Schools: The Grassroots Revolution
Link – BOOK (Brown) Dare to lead
Link – BOOK (Couros) The innovators mindset
THOUGHT LEADERS
Michael Fullan: Known for work on change leadership and system improvement, emphasizing moral purpose, relationships, and “leading from the middle.”
John Hattie: Education researcher best known for synthesizing an enormous body of studies to identify which teaching and leadership practices have the greatest impact on student learning, and for arguing that leaders’ core job is to know and improve their impact.
Richard DuFour: A central figure in the development and scaling of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs), focusing on collaborative inquiry around student learning.
Robert Marzano: Synthesizes large bodies of research into practical leadership frameworks (e.g., school‑level factors that influence achievement, balanced leadership).
Andy Hargreaves: Focuses on professional capital, collaboration, and sustainable leadership, often connecting leadership decisions to teacher well‑being and long‑term improvement.
Linda Darling‑Hammond: Through the Learning Policy Institute, she has heavily influenced how we think about preparation and ongoing support for principals as instructional and equity leaders.
Pedro Noguera: Known for research and writing on equity, school reform, and how leaders address structural inequalities, discipline disparities, and opportunity gaps.
Douglas Reeves, Mike Schmoker, Joellen Killion, Bruce Wellman: These practitioners and consultants are cited in research‑based leadership keys for their work on data‑driven decision‑making, focused school improvement, and job‑embedded professional learning.
Todd Whitaker: Author of “What Great Principals Do Differently” and similar works that translate research into concrete habits and mindset shifts for school leaders.
Paul Teys: An Australian principal and mentor whose books “So You Want to Be a Principal” and “Now You’re a Principal” are cited as practical guides to the evolving demands of school leadership.
RESEARCH / REPORT / GUIDE
Link – RESEARCH (PMC) Effective school leadership for supporting student mental health
Link – RESEARCH (Scholarworks) Ineffective school leadership
Link – RESEARCH (IES) School leadership
Link – RESEARCH (AERA) Research summary: School Leadership
Link – GUIDE (Educ Week) What makes a principal great? (includes video’s)
Link – GUIDE (Hanover Research Brief) Principal Evaluation
Link – GUIDE (Hanover Research Brief) Developing a Professional Learning Plan (for teachers)
Link – GUIDE (EDT) Successful school leadership
Link – GUIDE (NASBE) Leadership
VIDEO
Link – VIDEO (EdWeek) 5 videos for school leaders
Link – VIDEOS (TED) 5 inspiring videos all educators should watch
Link – VIDEO (TED) Teachers lesson on leadership
Link – VIDEO (TED) 19 inspiring leadership TED talks
Link – VIDEOS (TED) How to be a great leader – TED playlist
Link – VIDEO (TED) Leadership in 21st century
Link – VIDEO (TED) Leadership growth
DIGITAL
Link – WEBSITE (WMU) High Impact Leadership (HIL)
Link – WEBSITE (Kotter) The Science of Change: Kotter Methodology
School Leader Digital Learning Guide (US DOE)
Offers a framework for how leaders can use digital tools to enable equitable digital learning, including infrastructure, teaching, leadership, and ongoing improvement. link
Thinking of a teaching strategy library as an asset for school leaders is powerful, because it turns “good teaching” from something abstract into a visible, shared, improvable set of moves.
Teaching Strategy Library: curated collection of research‑based instructional strategies, each clearly described – what it is, when to use it, how to implement it, and often examples or templates.
PROGRAMS
Relay Leadership Programs: Relay offers multi‑tiered programs: a National Principal Academy Fellowship for sitting principals, a National Principal Supervisors Academy for principal managers, short Instructional Leadership PD for non‑principal leaders, and an elite Leverage Leadership Institute for high‑performing leaders. link
Center for Creative Leadership – K–12 Educational Leadership: CCL runs leadership training for principals, headmasters, and district leaders, focusing on core leadership skills (self‑awareness, communication, change leadership) and offers customized engagements for districts and networks.link
Institute for Educational Leadership (IEL): IEL builds capacity of individuals and teams to strengthen education and community systems, with programs that emphasize cross‑sector collaboration, equity, and community engagement.link
High Impact Leadership (HIL): The HIL Model for School Renewal is a systems approach to complex change in schools, designed explicitly to improve student achievement (especially literacy) by changing how leaders and teachers think, talk, and act. link
References
Almarshad. (2017). The Effects of Instructional, Transformation and Distributed Leadership on Students’ Academic Outcomes: A Meta -Analysis. International Journal of Education and Practice.
Brown, B. (2018). Dare to lead: Brave work, tough conversations, whole hearts. Penguin. link
Burkett, Jerry and Hayes, Sonya D. (2023) “Ineffective school leadership: Teachers weigh-in,“School Leadership Review: Vol. 18: Iss. 1, Article 7.
https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/slr/vol18/iss1/7
Camburn, E., Rowan, B., & Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 25(4), 347-73.
Chin. (2007). Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review.
Costa, A. & Garmston, R. (2016). Cognitive coaching: Developing self-directed leaders and learners (3rd edition). Lanham MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
Couros, G. (2015). The innovators mindset: Empower learning, unleash talent, and lead a culture of creativity. Dave Burgess Consulting. link
Daly BP, Resnikoff A, Litke S. (2025). Effective School Leadership for Supporting Students’ Mental Health: Findings from a Narrative Literature Review. Behav Sci (Basel). Jan 1;15(1):36.
Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., & Orr, M. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development program: Executive summary. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute.
Dufor, R. (2015). In praise of American educators: And how they can become even better. Solution Tree.
Dufor, R. (2016). Learning by doing. (3rd edition). Solution Tree
Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington D.C.: Albert Shanker Institute
Ertem. (2021). Relationship of School Leadership with School Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Education Studies.
Fullan, M. (2007). Change theory as a force for school improvement. In Intelligent leadership (pp. 27-39). Springer Netherlands.
Fullan, M. (2001). Chapter eight. The principal. The new meaning of educational change (pp. 137-150). New York: Teachers College Press.
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 1-13.
Goodlad, J. I. (1994). Educational renewal: Better teachers, better schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Goldhaber, D. (2016). In schools, teacher quality matters the most. Education Next, 16(2), 56-62.
Grant, A. (2023). Hidden Potential: The science of achieving great things, Viking. link
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership & Management, 30(2), 95–110.
Hallinger, P & Kovacevic, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: Science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369 Link
Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3-41.
Joram, J., et al (2020). What influences teacher buy-in of research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88
Kohn, A. (1999). The schools are children deserve: Moving beyond traditional classrooms and tougher standards. Houghton Mifflin. link
Kotter, J.P. (2012). Leading Change. Harvard Business Press . Link
Leithwood & Sun. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership a meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly.
Liebowitz & Porter (2019). The effect of principal behaviors on student, teacher, and school outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research.
Lipton, L. & Wellman, B. (2022). Learning focused supervision. MIRVA Link
Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 245-275.
Marsden, J. (2021). Take risks. Macmillan. Link
Marzano, R., et al. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. ASCD. link
Marzano, R., & Simms, J. (2013). Coaching classroom instruction. Marzano Research.
Patterson, K., et. al. (2005). Crucial conversations: Tools for resolving broken promises, violated expectations, and bad behavior. McGraw-Hill.
Portin, B. S., & Shen, J. (1998). The changing principalship: Its current status, variability, and impact. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 5 (3), 93-113.
Reeves, P., Bierlein Palmer, L., McCrumb, D., & Shen, J. (2014). Sustaining a renewal model for school improvement. In K. Sanzo (Ed.), From policy to practice: Sustainable innovations in school leadership preparation and development (pp. 267-292). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Renlund. (2017). Authentic Leadership in Teams: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Dissertation.
Robinson, K. (2016). Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. Penguin Books. link
Robinson, Lloyd, & Rowe. (2008). The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types. Educational Administration Quarterly.
Scheerens & Steen. (2012). Earlier meta-analyses. In School Leadership Effects Revisited. Book.
Senge, P., et.al (2000). Schools that learn. Doubleday.
Shen, Wu, Reeves, Zheng, Ryan, & Anderson. (2020). The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review.
Shen, J., Wu, H., Reeves, P., Zheng, Y., Ryan, L., & Anderson, D. (2020). The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis.Educational Research Review,31(100357). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100357
Shen, J. & V. E. Cooley (Eds.) (2013). A resource book for improving principals’ learning-centered leadership. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Shen, J., & Xia, J. (2012). The relationship between teachers’ and principals’ power: Is it a win-win situation or zero-sum game? International Journal of Leadership in Education 15 (2), 153-174.
Spillane, J. P., Shalveson, R., Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30 (3), 23-28.
Tan, Dimmock, & Walker. (2021). How school leadership practices relate to student outcomes: Insights from a three-level meta-analysis. Educational Management Administration and Leadership.
Tsai. (2015). A preliminary meta-analysis of teacher leadership. Journal of Education and Literature.
Wang. (2012). Thirty-year study on the relationship between US Principal’s leadership and student achievement. Education Academic Monthly.
Waters & Marzano. (2006). School District Leadership that Works: The Effect of Superintendent Leadership on Student Achievement. Conference paper.
Wiliam, D. (2016). Leadership for teacher learning: Creating a culture where all teachers improve so that all students succeed. West Palm Beach: Learning Sciences International.
Witziers, Bosker, & Kruger. (2003). Educational Leadership and Student Achievement: The Elusive Search for an Association. Educational Administration Quarterly.
WMU. High Impact Leadership (HIL). Link
Principal & School Leadership
DEFINITIONS
Principals and other school leaders who provide leadership, management, and vision for schools. The focus of these studies can be management perspective (e.g., transformational, instructional, distributive), overseeing and involvement in professional learning, focus and mission, and the indirect and direct effects of leaders on students learning.
An effective school leader must embrace the identity of a learning-focused supervisor. In many cases, a growth orientation requires a shift in identity from: decider / manager/ fixer to problem framer / goal-setter / learner.”
The deepest purpose of supervision is to create a culture of learning. A learning culture makes knowledge public, spreads good ideas, and energizes best practices. A reflective and inquiry-driven environment increases a shared understanding of effective practice and provides a wide-range of perspectives for examining critical issues. Lipton & Wellman (2022) p.2
DATA
-
28 Meta-analysis reviews
-
1,198 Research studies
-
1.3 Million students in research
-
5 Confidence level. Hattie (2023) p. 155
QUOTES
“Teacher effectiveness links directly to student learning and skillful supervision links directly to teacher effectiveness.” Lipton & Wellman (2022) p. xi
“It is not charisma and charm but competence to reliability identify concerns, deal with difficult problems, engender trust, and develop a collective purpose to create a year’s growth during a school year for all students.” Hattie (2023) p. 71
“It is not adjusting with curricula, tinkering with the structural aspects of school, introducing new grouping or enrichment classes for some, worrying about resources or the deficits of parents, or building web pages. It is the promotion and development of building the collective power of adults in school to positively impact student learning and outcomes.” Hattie (2023) p. 72
“Entrenched customs, infrequent teacher observations, and feel-good feedback will not stimulate the vital forms of instructional improvement and teacher growth schools need. Lipton & Wellman (2022) p. xi
“Principals have a key role in negating deficit thinking. Deficit thinking pathologizes the students and their background as the problem and relieves educators of self-scrutiny about their thinking and practices. All students can learn, but can we as educators recognize students strengths and embrace our own learning and change to help them learn?” Hattie (2023) p. 72
“While the direct impact of school leaders on students is not as high as that of teachers, principals can have an enormous positive difference in the learning lives of students and teachers. I’ve seen a bad principal destroys a good school in less than a year, and I’ve seen a great principal turn a bad school around in a couple of weeks.” Marsden (2021) p. 99
“Effective leaders must be willing to challenge the status quo…but this can only happen if they build trust and relationships, engage in the same change journey as the teachers, and demonstrate and participate in the bumpy journey of change collaboratively.” Robinson (2011)
“The move from a focus on management to leadership can be difficult for principals. It requires leaving the office and the computer and moving to the classrooms, hallways and all parts of the school in order to be engaged with the teachers and students. The leadership principal has a laser-emphasis on student learning and development. The goal is for all students to gain at least a years-growth for years-input (with a shared notion of what a years-growth means and the evidence of this growth.” Hallinger (2019) p. 350
“Teachers need to trust administrators and feel they work in a positive school. This is a strong predictor of the use of evidence. They need to feel involved in decision making, feel their personal knowledge is respected, and understand that the administrator is the “head learner” participating with them in regular acts of discovery.” Joram (2020) p. 88
“When principals disperse leadership, teachers will then advocate for what they help create.” Dufor (2015) p. 227
“When principals facilitate change at school they need to do it with a team of teachers committed to change. They need to clarify school strengths and challenges; identify goals to address the needs; developed shared knowledge of resources, timeline and activities; recommend solutions; build consensus for solutions; and most importantly provide the coaching and support to help teachers achieve specific outcomes and stay the course.” Dufor (2015) 229
“Principal alone as instructional leader does not work. We find no relationship between a principals overall time spent on instructional activities and school effectiveness and improvement. If principals want to improve student learning in school, they must focus on building robust, strong teams of collaborative teachers engaged in the collective analysis of teaching and learning.” Dufor (2016) p. 148
“Supervision is a growth-oriented process – not event. In contrast with event-driven models that are exclusive to contractually mandated observation and feedback cycles, learning focused supervision integrates with school life and can occur in brief hallway exchanges, informal classroom visits, and grade-level department meetings.” Lipton & Wellman (2022) p. 2
“Scaffolding is key. A teacher or coach offers initial instruction and then removes the support. The goal is to shift the responsibility. It’s often said that where there’s a will, there’s a way. What we overlook is that when people can’t see a path they stop dreaming of the destination. To ignite their will, we need to show them the way. That’s what scaffolding can do” Grant (2023) p. 14
“When giving feedback, administrators are often reluctant to share it. We are confusing politeness with kindness. Being polite is withholding feedback to make someone feel good today. Being kind is being candid about they can be better tomorrow. Instead of seeking feedback, you’re better off asking for advice. Feedback tends to focus on how well you did last time. Advice shifts attention to how you can do better next time. Rather than dwelling on what you did wrong, advice guides you towards what you can do right.” Grant (2023) p.55
“Experts are especially bad at teaching students (or teachers). Why? They’ve come too far to remember what it’s like being in your shoes. It’s called the curse of knowledge: the more you know, the harder it is for you to fathom what it’s like to not know. A great deal of expert knowledge is tacit – it’s implicit not explicit. The further you progress toward mastery, the less conscious awareness you often have of the fundamentals.” Grant (2023) p. 115
“Learning focused supervisors are inquisitive. They are more curious than judgmental and look for causality without impulsively taking action…they are risk-takers in their own learning who work incrementally and challenge unproductive habits. The supervisors role is to continually increase capacity and decrease dependency, thereby empowering rather than enabling.” Lipton & Wellman (2022) pgs. 4 & 31
