Teacher Practical Guidance:

Prior Knowledge (KWL)

Category: Assessment & Planning

Rank Order

37

Effect Size

0.64

Achievement Gain %

24

How-To Strategies

BENEFITS


  • It activates background knowledge and makes content more relevant by surfacing what students already think they know about the topic. link

 

  • It promotes active learning, goal setting, and student ownership since students generate their own questions and track what they have learned. link

 

  • It supports longer retention and deeper understanding by explicitly linking prior knowledge, inquiry questions, and post-learning summaries. link

 

 

 

HOW TO


  • KWL can be a group discussion during pre-assessment phase of lesson: “What do you know about this? What would you like to know?”

 

  • Make group list or chart

 

  • KWL can also be done individually by students in a 2-column writing assignment during pre-assessment: K column, W column

 

  • Based on K and W teachers and students together create “Success Criteria”

 

  • Add H to chart (KWHL) to build students self-efficacy when you ask “How will you learn this?”

 

  • Change W (What do you want to know?) to (What do you Wonder about?) which is easier for younger students.

 

  • Use KWL with texts, videos, guest speakers, labs, field trips, or full thematic units.

 

  • Individual, pair, small-group, or whole-class charts, depending on age and purpose.

 

  • Keep a class KWL posted and update the L column throughout the unit so it becomes a living record of learning and a tool for formative assessment.

 

  • For reflection, ask students to write a brief summary or exit ticket using their L column as a scaffold.  link

 

 

 

CHALLENGES


  • Students may record misconceptions or “what they think they know.”

 

  • KWL functions more as a metacognitive/note-taking tool than a robust comprehension strategy.

 

  • Whole-class KWL discussions can be time-consuming, especially when students brainstorm tangential, trivial, or unanswerable questions in the “W” column.

 

  • KWL can be distracting or inaccessible for students who are not yet proficient readers or who have weak executive-function skills, since it relies on reading, writing, and working memory.

 

  • Teachers sometimes use KWL with any text/topic, even when students have little prior knowledge, rather than reserving it for familiar or conceptually rich topics where it adds genuine value. link

 

 

 

WHAT NOT TO DO


  • Do not do a quick KWL at the beginning and never return to it.

 

  • Avoid using KWL as a generic “anytime” activity without a clear purpose, text, or unit question.

 

  • Do not simply record everything students “know” and move on; uncorrected inaccurate or irrelevant prior knowledge can confuse later reading.

 

  • Avoid assuming all prior knowledge is helpful; you need to probe, clarify, and, when needed, gently correct.

 

  • Do not let “what we want to know” turn into a random wish list.

 

  • Do not use KWL as the main comprehension strategy; over‑focusing on students’ experiences and opinions can pull attention away from what the author actually says.

 

  • Do not have students fill in charts silently and collect them; without talk, many misconceptions and thin ideas stay hidden.  link

 

 

References

Engel, S. (2015). The Hungry Mind: The Origins of Curiosity in Childhood. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

 

Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: the sequel. Routledge.

 

Kharbach, M. (2023, November 2). Free printable KWL chart templates for teachers. Educators Technology. https://www.educatorstechnology.com/2023/06/free-printable-kwl-chart-templates-for-teachers.html

 

Kim, Kim, Lee, Park, Hong, & Kim (2008). Effects of cognitive learning strategies for Korean learners: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review.

 

Kohn, A. (posted June 2, 2015). Learning as a sandwich. Psychology Today https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-homework-myth/201506/learning-sandwich.

 

Ogle, D. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39(6) Link

 

Pagani, V. (2019). Kwl as a possible model to connect self-assessment and feedback: The students’ view. International Conference on Teaching, Learning and Education.

 

Perplexity (2024). *Perplexity.ai* (AI chatbot). https://www.perplexity.ai/

 

Ritchart, R. and Perkins, D. (2008). Making thinking visible. Educational Leadership, 65, 57-61.

 

Sornson, B. (2012). Fanatically Formative: Successful learning during the crucial K-3 years. Corwin.

 

Szabo, S. (2006). KWHHL: A student driven evolution of the KWL. American Secondary Education, 34(3) Link

Prior Knowledge (KWL)

 

DEFINITION

KWL is a simple three-step strategy where students record what they know, what they want to know, and what they have learned about a topic, typically before, during, and after a lesson. It is used to activate prior knowledge, set a clear purpose for learning, and support metacognition and summarizing.

 

KWL(H): KWL(H)  is an acronym for Know, Want-to-know, and Learned or How-can-I-Learn, serving as an effective method to enhance comprehension and retention.  It involves a three-column graphic organizer chart where students record what they know about a topic, what they want to learn, and what they have learned  In (1986) Ogle posited that prior knowledge plays a critical role in how students interpret what they read and what they learn from reading.

Prior Knowledge: Refers to the information, skills, and experiences that students possess before encountering new learning material. It is a crucial element in the learning process as it forms the foundation upon which new knowledge is built. According to constructivist theory, new knowledge is constructed from existing knowledge. Teachers can leverage students’ prior knowledge to facilitate deeper understanding and meaningful connections with new concepts. When teachers know what students already know and what they are interested in learning, they stand a better chance of providing access to and information that is more relevant and meaningful.

 

DATA

  • 1 Meta Analysis review

  • 10 Research studies

  • 920 Students in studies

  • 2 Confidence level. Hattie (2023) p. 346

 

QUOTES

“The most important single factor influencing learning is what the learner already knows…relate new ideas to current knowledge and interests of students.” Hattie (2023) p. 59

 

 

 

“KWL is a meta-cognitive process (they think about their thinking), effective brainstorming approach, and important formative assessment technique useful for planning targeted lessons that match students prior knowledge and interests.” Szabo (2006)

 

 

 

“To read well, we must access the knowledge we already have about the topic, or make it available appropriately so that comprehension can occur.” Ogle (1986)