Teacher Practical Guidance:

Retention

Category: Assessment & Planning

Rank Order

98

Effect Size

-0.23

Achievement Gain %

-9

How-To Strategies

Potential Benefits:

  • Some studies find that in the repeat year, retained students often show improved performance in reading and math compared with similarly low-achieving promoted peers.

 

  • Early-grade retention can also temporarily boost behavioral engagement, school belonging, and perceived academic self-efficacy during the repeat year.

 

  • Repeating can align demands better with their developmental level and ease immediate frustration.

 

Main Drawbacks & Risks

  • Meta-analyses and reviews spanning decades report that, on average, retained students do no better and often worse academically over time than matched peers who were promoted.

 

  • Higher likelihood of later dropout, lower completion rates, and poorer educational and employment outcomes into late adolescence and early adulthood.

 

  • Show lower self-esteem, weaker academic self-concept, more problem behaviors, and poorer peer relationships.

 

  • The stigma of being older than classmates and “held back” can erode belonging, especially in later grades, and is one reason retention is a strong predictor of eventually leaving school.

 

 

When retention is more or less defensible?

  • Retention by itself is not an effective solution to low achievement and should be rare.

 

  • Outcomes are more likely to be benign or somewhat positive if It occurs in early elementary grades rather than middle or high school.

 

  • Is part of a comprehensive plan that changes instruction (intensive remediation, special education supports, tutoring, family partnership), not just repeating the same experience.

 

  • Instead of relying on retention or automatic social promotion, schools should invest in early intervention, multi-tiered support systems, and differentiated instruction to address unfinished learning.

References

Allen, Chen, Willson, & Hughes. (2009). Quality of Research Design Moderates Effects of Grade Retention on Achievement: A Meta-Analytic, Multilevel Analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.

 

Goos, Pipa, & Peixoto. (2021). Effectiveness of grade retention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review.

 

Holmes (1983). The Fourth R: Retention. Journal of Research and Development in Education.

 

Holmes & Matthews. (1984). The Effects of Nonpromotion on Elementary and Junior High School Pupils: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research.

 

Holmes (1989). Grade Level Retention Effects: A Meta-Analysis of Research Studies. Research and Policies on Retention.

 

Jimerson (2001). A synthesis of grade retention research: Looking backward and moving forward. California School Psychologist.

 

Wu W, West SG, Hughes JN. (2010).  Effect of Grade Retention in First Grade on Psychosocial Outcomes. J Educ Psychol.

Retention

DEFINTION

The practice of retaining a student in a single grade-level in the next academic year because she or he has been prevented from making adequate progress.

 

DATA

  • 10 Meta-analysis reviews

  • 339 Research studies

  • 51,000 Students involved in research

  • 4 Confidence level. Hattie (2023) p. 185

 

QUOTES

 

Grade retention (having a student repeat a grade) can provide short-term academic and psychosocial benefits for some students, but overall research links it to negative long-term academic, social, and emotional outcomes, including a higher risk of dropping out. Effects also depend heavily on whether retention is paired with strong interventions, or is simply “do the same year again.” link

 

 

 

Retained students should receive a structured, multi-tiered package of supports that changes their instruction, time, and services, rather than simply repeating the same experience. Professional groups describe this as “promotion plus” or “retention plus” targeted interventions, ideally within an MTSS/RTI framework. link