Teacher Practical Guidance:
Retention
Category: Assessment & Planning
Rank Order
Effect Size
Achievement Gain %
How-To Strategies
Potential Benefits:
- Some studies find that in the repeat year, retained students often show improved performance in reading and math compared with similarly low-achieving promoted peers.
- Early-grade retention can also temporarily boost behavioral engagement, school belonging, and perceived academic self-efficacy during the repeat year.
- Repeating can align demands better with their developmental level and ease immediate frustration.
Main Drawbacks & Risks
- Meta-analyses and reviews spanning decades report that, on average, retained students do no better and often worse academically over time than matched peers who were promoted.
- Higher likelihood of later dropout, lower completion rates, and poorer educational and employment outcomes into late adolescence and early adulthood.
- Show lower self-esteem, weaker academic self-concept, more problem behaviors, and poorer peer relationships.
- The stigma of being older than classmates and “held back” can erode belonging, especially in later grades, and is one reason retention is a strong predictor of eventually leaving school.
When retention is more or less defensible?
- Retention by itself is not an effective solution to low achievement and should be rare.
- Outcomes are more likely to be benign or somewhat positive if It occurs in early elementary grades rather than middle or high school.
- Is part of a comprehensive plan that changes instruction (intensive remediation, special education supports, tutoring, family partnership), not just repeating the same experience.
- Instead of relying on retention or automatic social promotion, schools should invest in early intervention, multi-tiered support systems, and differentiated instruction to address unfinished learning.
How-To Resources
Link – ARTICLE (GreatSchools) Pro’s and Con’s of Retention
Link – ARTICLE (MI Alliance) Social Promotion
Link – RESEARCH (PMC) Effects of Retention
Link – ARTICLE (NASP) Position statement on Retention
Link – RESEARCH (PMC) 1st Grade retention
Link – ARTICLE (EdWeek) What does research say about retention
References
Allen, Chen, Willson, & Hughes. (2009). Quality of Research Design Moderates Effects of Grade Retention on Achievement: A Meta-Analytic, Multilevel Analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
Goos, Pipa, & Peixoto. (2021). Effectiveness of grade retention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review.
Holmes (1983). The Fourth R: Retention. Journal of Research and Development in Education.
Holmes & Matthews. (1984). The Effects of Nonpromotion on Elementary and Junior High School Pupils: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research.
Holmes (1989). Grade Level Retention Effects: A Meta-Analysis of Research Studies. Research and Policies on Retention.
Jimerson (2001). A synthesis of grade retention research: Looking backward and moving forward. California School Psychologist.
Wu W, West SG, Hughes JN. (2010). Effect of Grade Retention in First Grade on Psychosocial Outcomes. J Educ Psychol.
Retention
DEFINTION
The practice of retaining a student in a single grade-level in the next academic year because she or he has been prevented from making adequate progress.
DATA
-
10 Meta-analysis reviews
-
339 Research studies
-
51,000 Students involved in research
-
4 Confidence level. Hattie (2023) p. 185
QUOTES
Grade retention (having a student repeat a grade) can provide short-term academic and psychosocial benefits for some students, but overall research links it to negative long-term academic, social, and emotional outcomes, including a higher risk of dropping out. Effects also depend heavily on whether retention is paired with strong interventions, or is simply “do the same year again.” link
