Teacher Practical Guidance:

School Finance

Category: External

Rank Order

74

Effect Size

0.20

Achievement Gain %

8

How-To Strategies

DEFINITION


School finance is how education systems raise, allocate, budget, and manage the money that funds schools — not just how much money they receive, but the rules and formulas that govern it.

 

 

 

BENEFITS


  • Teacher capacity — competitive salaries, smaller class sizes, and instructional support that help recruit and retain qualified staff.Link

 

  • Facilities and materials — safe, well-maintained buildings, current learning resources, supplies, and transportation. nces.ed

 

  • Student services — special education, tutoring, counseling, and supports for English learners and students from low-income families through programs like Title I and IDEA. files.eric.ed

 

  • Better student outcomes — a synthesis of 31 credible causal studies found increased spending raises test scores, high-school graduation, and college-going on average. nber

 

  • Stronger long-term results — gains in educational attainment and adult earnings, with the largest benefits for children from low-income families. nber

 

 

 

 

SCHOOL FINANCE PRIORITIES


To have the most impact on student achievement, school finance should prioritize:

1. Time for teacher collaboration and professional development

2. Instructional supplies

3. Instructional methodology (evidence-based) that solves student achievement and fosters social-emotional development

4. Too much money is spent on structural solutions like class size, length of school year, and creating new school structures. Greenwald (1996)

5. Effect-size data on popular ways to spend money in schools (note the following do not change student achievement much)

  • 0.15 increase in per pupil funding

 

  • 0.22 teacher conference attendance

 

  • 0.18 teacher experience

 

  • 0.16 teacher salary

 

  • 0.04 class size

 

 

 

CHALLENGES


  • Reliance on local property taxes — communities with lower property wealth have less capacity to raise local school revenue, so equitable state funding becomes critical. Link

 

  • State-to-state variation — large differences in funding across states mean students’ access to educational resources depends partly on where they live. brookings

 

  • Special education underfunding — federal IDEA funding remains below its authorized “full funding” benchmark, leaving states and districts responsible for financing legally required services. files.eric.ed

 

  • Aging facilities — GAO’s 2020 national survey found about half of districts need to update or replace multiple building systems, such as HVAC. gao

 

  • Recession vulnerability — economic downturns destabilize school budgets; research on Great Recession-era cuts found lower test scores and college-going and widening achievement gaps

 

  • Within-district inequity — differences in the distribution of experienced, higher-paid teachers can produce unequal staffing expenditures across schools in the same district. brookings

 

  • Enrollment decline and choice expansion — these trends can create budget pressures and instability for many public school systems. brookings

 

 

 

WHAT NOT TO DO


  • Don’t create ongoing commitments with one-time money — temporary funds (like federal relief dollars) shouldn’t fund recurring expenses unless there’s a sustainable funding or phase-out plan.

 

  • Don’t assume across-the-board class-size reduction is the best investment — large-scale, untargeted reductions require hiring many inexperienced teachers and can divert money from higher-return uses. brookings

 

  • Don’t budget only for the coming year — use multiyear forecasts that account for enrollment trends, expiring funds, and salary commitments. edweek

 

  • Don’t let finance and instruction operate in silos — align spending decisions with instructional priorities rather than treating them as separate conversations. edweek

 

  • Don’t treat emergency reserves as a fix for recurring deficits — experts recommend keeping one to three months of annual spending in reserve for genuine emergencies. edweek

 

  • Don’t leave outdated funding formulas in place — formulas based on stale student counts, needs, or costs misdirect resources. edweek

 

  • Don’t cut indiscriminately — assess how cuts affect student services and engagement, especially for students who need additional support to stay connected to school. Edwin

How-To Resources

ARTICLES


Link – ARTICLE (ERIC) How are public schools funded?

 

Link – ARTICLE (EPI) Public education funding in US needs overhaul

 

Link – ARTICLE (Brookings) Title 1 funds should target funding inequities

 

Link – ARTICLE (Brookings) Does funding matter?

 

Link – ARTICLE (Brookings) It’s not nothing: The role of money in improving education

 

Link – ARTICLE (EPI) Investing for student success

 

Link – ARTICLE (NU) More money, worse results?

 

Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Prioritizing student learning: Rethinking money

 

Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Is your school asking the right questions about poverty?

 

Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Educational systems and budgeting

 

Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Beyond bake sales: Family subsidy of public schools

 

Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Money talks

 

Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Franchising success across a district

 

Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) A teacher imagines what he’d do with 10x classroom budget

 

Link – ARTICLE (EduTopia) Sustaining success despite budget cuts

 

 

 

 

RESEARCH / REPORT / GUIDE


Link – RESEARCH (QJoEcon) What works and for whom?

 

Link – RESEARCH (NBER) Grants to school districts: Impact?

 

Link – RESEARCH (AEA) What impacts can we expect for school spending policy?

 

Link – REPORT (Live) School funding and outcomes

 

Link – REPORT (EduScorecard) From learning recession to learning recovery

 

Link – REPORT (NBER) Distribution of school spending and impact

 

Link – REPORT (NBER) Effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes

 

Link – REPORT (GAO) Building needs US

 

Link – REPORT (Edunomics) Nat’l education funding database

 

Link – GUIDE (Gov) IDEA funding primer

 

 

 

THOUGHT LEADERS


Bruce D. Baker, University of Miami: Focuses on funding adequacy and equity, including how much funding schools need to provide equal educational opportunity. His work is especially useful for understanding needs-based funding formulas and disparities across districts. schoolfinancedata

 

C. Kirabo Jackson, Northwestern University: Studies how school spending affects achievement, educational attainment, and adult earnings. His research provides evidence that increased funding can improve students’ outcomes, particularly for children from low-income families. ipr.northwestern

 

Marguerite Roza, Georgetown University’s Edunomics Lab: Focuses on spending transparency, financial leadership, and budget trade-offs. Her work helps school leaders examine where dollars go and make more informed decisions about allocating resources.

 

 

 

 

DIGITAL TOOLS


School Finance Indicators Database (SFID): Free interactive tools for examining funding adequacy, equity, and state investment in education. Useful for comparing states and districts and identifying potential funding gaps. schoolfinancedata

 

\NERD$, Edunomics Lab: School-by-school spending data for exploring resource allocation and differences within districts; its dataset module is being updated, and access currently requires contacting the Edunomics team.edunomicslab

 

Frontline Financial Planning & Budget Management Analytics: Tools for multiyear budget forecasting, scenario comparisons, spending monitoring, and communicating financial information to school boards and communities. frontlineeducation

 

ClearGov: Budget-development and communication tools covering operational, personnel, and capital budgets, plus interactive digital budget books for public transparency. cleargov

 

Lightspeed Insight: Digital-resource usage analytics that help districts identify underused applications and inform subscription and purchasing decisions; usage should inform, rather than substitute for, evaluation of educational value.lightspeedsystems

References

Biasi, Julien Lafortune, David Schönholzer, (2025). What Works and for Whom? Effectiveness and Efficiency of School Capital Investments Across the U.S., The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Volume 140, Issue 3,  Pages 2329–2379, https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaf013

 

Childs & Shakeshaft. (1986). A meta-analysis of research on the relationship between educational expenditures and student achievement.Journal of Education Finance.

 

Davis-Beggs. (2013). The effects of school resources on student achievement. Dissertation.

 

Greenwald, R., et Al. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361-396. Link

 

Hedges, Laine, & Greenwald. (1996). An Exchange: Part I: Does Money Matter? A Meta-Analysis of Studies of the Effects of Differential School Inputs on Student Outcomes. Educational Researcher.

 

Jackson, C. Kirabo, and Claire L. Mackevicius. (2024) What Impacts Can We Expect from School Spending Policy? Evidence from Evaluations in the United States. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 16 (1): 412–46.

 

School Finance

DATA

  • 6 meta-analysis reviews

  • 228 research studies

  • 2 million students in research

  • 4 Confidence level. Hattie (2023) p. 155

 

 

QUOTES

“It’s not the amount of money spent, it is how the money is spent.” Geenfield (1996)

 

 

Increased school funding often does improve achievement, but it does not guarantee immediate gains in every school or district. The most credible evidence synthesis finds positive average effects, alongside substantial variation in results and smaller benefits for economically advantaged populations (Jackson and Mackevicius, 2024)