Teacher Practical Guidance:
Exercise & Fitness
Category: Content
Rank Order
Effect Size
Achievement Gain %
How-To Strategies
BENEFITS
-
Improve attention, working memory, and processing speed, which support learning in subjects like math and reading.
-
Are linked with higher grades, better test performance, and improved academic achievement when students get at least about 60–90 minutes of moderate‑to‑vigorous activity per week in school settings.
-
Increase on‑task behavior, focus, and participation after activity breaks or active lessons, leading to more effective use of instructional time.
-
Improve attendance and reduce disruptive behavior, which are both strongly associated with higher academic performance over time.
-
Reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression and improve mood and self‑esteem, which support motivation, persistence, and willingness to tackle challenging academic work.
-
Help students feel more confident and “ready to learn,” including improved confidence in specific areas such as mathematics.
-
Enhance overall physical health (cardiorespiratory fitness, healthy weight, bone strength), reducing illness and fatigue that interfere with learning.
-
Build lifelong health habits associated with better long‑term educational attainment and reduced risk of chronic disease that can disrupt schooling. link
HOW TO
-
Use a Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program (CSPAP) model with five coordinated components: quality PE, activity during school, before/after-school opportunities, staff involvement, and family/community engagement.
-
Aim for students to accumulate at least 60 minutes of physical activity daily across these components, with PE as the foundation and classroom and after-school activities adding additional minutes.
-
Align PE curriculum with national standards that emphasize physically literate students who demonstrate competency in motor skills, knowledge, and fitness concepts.
-
Ensure PE delivers substantial moderate-to-vigorous activity time and explicit fitness instruction (aerobic endurance, strength, flexibility).
-
Integrate physically active lessons (e.g., math on the move, vocabulary relays, station rotations with movement) that pair content learning with structured activity, especially in elementary and early middle school.
-
Meta-analyses show physically active lessons produce large increases in in-lesson physical activity and small but significant gains in educational outcomes and time-on-task, particularly without detracting from core instructional time.
-
Use short “activity breaks” or brain boosters (3–10 minutes of brisk movement) in homeroom, transitions, or long blocks, which experimental studies link to improved attention, on-task behavior, and small gains in academic performance.
-
Provide structured before- and after-school programs (walking clubs, intramurals, fitness clubs) that add 60–120 minutes of weekly activity; multicomponent interventions with such elements show modest improvements in numeracy and reading. link
CHALLENGES
-
Administrators, teachers, and students often view physical activity as competing with academic time.
-
PE minutes are frequently squeezed by test preparation, assemblies, remediation, and schedule changes, making it difficult to provide the frequency and duration needed to reach 60 minutes of daily activity.
-
Many schools report institutional barriers such as inadequate indoor/outdoor space, limited equipment, overcrowded classes, and insufficient funding to support quality PE or after-school programs.
-
Classroom and PE teachers may lack specific training, confidence, or skills to implement active lessons, CSPAP-style initiatives, or inclusive activity for diverse learners.
-
Competing demands, limited planning time, and a perception that PA is a lower priority than core academics reduce enthusiasm for and consistency of implementation.
-
School culture and leadership priorities strongly influence whether PE and PA are valued; when physical education is positioned as nonessential, it receives less schedule time, budget, and support.
-
Students report barriers such as lack of choice, controlling teaching styles, large classes, and activities that privilege athletic students, which can undermine motivation and reduce participation, especially among inactive or marginalized youth. Link
WHAT NOT TO DO
-
Do not use exercise as punishment (e.g., push-ups or laps for misbehavior), which is widely identified as an inappropriate practice that makes students associate movement with shame and control.
-
Do not tolerate bullying, teasing, or public comparison of bodies or performance (e.g., posting mile times, ranking fitness test scores), which is linked to truancy, discipline problems, and long-term avoidance of PE.
-
Do not rely on outdated, high-risk, or exclusionary activities (e.g., traditional dodgeball, mass calisthenics with no form instruction, sit-up-heavy routines) that offer little skill learning and can humiliate or injure less-skilled students.
-
Do not design programs around narrow performance benchmarks (e.g., mandatory 10-minute mile for all) without differentiation, which can demotivate most students and ignore developmental and ability differences.
-
Do not treat PE as random games without a standards-based curriculum focused on skills, fitness knowledge, and lifelong activity habits; “roll out the ball” approaches are a common criticism of ineffective PE.
-
Do not use fitness tests as high-stakes grades or gatekeeping; tests should be diagnostic tools for goal setting and progress, not pass/fail hurdles or public spectacles.
-
Do not cut or marginalize PE and activity time to “protect” academics; this is specifically cautioned against in policy discussions because it undermines both health and learning.
-
Do not assign untrained or unwilling staff to run PE or fitness programs simply to cover the schedule; lack of content knowledge contributes to unsafe exercises, poor progression, and low engagement.
-
Do not skip ongoing professional learning and reflection; experienced PE teachers describe “thinking they knew everything” and stopping reading/reflecting as major long-term mistakes. Link
How-To Resources
ARTICLES
Link – ARTICLE (Kids) Cognitive benefits of physical activity
Link – ARTICLE (GraduateProg) Why physical education is as important as academics
Link – ARTICLE (CSPAP) What is CSPAP?
Link – ARTICLE (Atlantic) Gym class is bad which is way students are skipping it
Link – ARTICLE (Fit2B) 4 problems with PE classes in America
Link – ARTICLE (GMUniv) Why some students dislike PE
Link – ARTICLE (TheCuttingRoom) Why I hate how PE is taught in public schools
Link – ARTICLE (Conversation) PE in school isn’t like adult exercise – but maybe it should be
Link – ARTICLE (ThinkMovement) 20 mistakes in 20 years of teaching PE
RESEARCH / REPORTS / GUIDE
Link – RESEARCH (PMC) Effects of physical activity on academic performance
Link – RESEARCH (PMC) Comprehensive school physical activity program
Link – RESEARCH (PubMed) Physically active lessons in schools and their impact
Link – RESEARCH (PEJournal) Barriers faced by PE teachers
Link – REPORT (USDOE) School physical activity and academic performance
Link – REPORT (CDC) Physical activity and sedentary behaviors
Link – REPORT (CDC) Evidence-based strategies for school nutrition
Link – REPORT (ShapeAmerica) Essential elements of physical education
Link – REPORT (BYU) Inappropriate PE: Top 8 repeat offenders
Link – GUIDE (ShapeAmerica) National PE standards
VIDEO
Link – VIDEO (YouTube) Teaching expectations in elementary PE through movement
Link – VIDEO (EducTopia) Making the case for PE
Link – VIDEO (YouTube) The PE specialist
Link – VIDEO (YouTube) MS PE – teaching with a purpose
Link – VIDEO (YouTube) PE moderate to vigorous
PROGRAMS
Comprehensive School Physical Activity Programs (CSPAP) – CSPAP is a multi-component framework in which schools “use all opportunities for students to be physically active,” aiming for 60 minutes of daily activity and lifelong skills for physical activity. link
CATCH PE / CATCH PE Journeys.- Evidence-based, standards-aligned PE curriculum emphasizing physical literacy, moderate-to-vigorous activity, non-elimination games, SEL, and lifelong healthy habits, often used within broader CATCH Whole Child models.link
SPARK PE (K–2, 3–6, Middle School, High School modules). Research-based PE curriculum with grade-band programs (K–2, 3–6, Middle, High School) focused on maximizing active time, skill development, and enjoyment through structured lesson plans, games, and assessments. link
EPEC – Exemplary Physical Education Curriculum (Michigan Fitness Foundation). Michigan Fitness Foundation’s comprehensive, standards-based curriculum organized around motor skills, fitness, and personal/social responsibility, with detailed grade-level outcomes and assessments. link
FIVE FOR LIFE Program – A PE/health curriculum from Focused Fitness that builds fitness knowledge and habits across five life stages, combining classroom lessons with activity-based units and fitness education.link
Physical Best – SHAPE America program that provides resources and training to teach health-related fitness concepts and self-assessment within PE, emphasizing personal goal setting and lifetime activity. link
PLT4M PE Curriculum Frameworks – Digital, standards-based PE curriculum and platform used mainly in secondary schools for strength training, fitness, and lifetime wellness courses, with progression-based units and video instruction. link
References
Alghadir A.H., Gab S.A., Iqbal Z.A. (2020). Effect of Gender, Physical Activity and Stress-Related Hormones on Adolescent’s Academic Achievements. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17:4143.
Alvarez-Bueno, et. al. (2017). Physical activity on executive functioning. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
Alvarez-Bueno, et. al. (2017). The effect of physical activity interventions on children’s cognition and metacognition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
Barbosa A., Whiting S., Simmonds P., Scotini Moreno R., Mendes R., Breda J. (2020). Physical Activity and Academic Achievement: An Umbrella Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17:5972.
Bruijn A.G.M.D., Kostons D.D.N.M., Fels I.M.J.V.D., Visscher C., Oosterlaan J., Hartman E., Bosker R.J. (2020). Effects of aerobic and cognitively-engaging physical activity on academic skills: A cluster randomized controlled trial. J. Sports Sci. 2020;38:1806–1817.
De Greeff J.W., Bosker R.J., Oosterlaan J., Visscher C., Hartman E. (2018). Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: A meta-analysis. J. Sci. Med. Sport. 21:501–507.
Dudley & Burden. (2019). What effect on learning does increasing the proportion of curriculum time allocated to physical education have? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Physical Education Review.
Dwyer, T., et al. (1996). Physical activity and performance in children. Nutrition Review, 54(4).
Dwyer, T., et al. (2001). Relation of academic performance to physical activity and fitness in children. Pediatric Exercise Science. 13.
Ericsson I., Karlsson M.K.(2012). Motor skills and school performance in children with daily physical education in school—A 9-year intervention study. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 24:273–278.
Greeff J.W., Hartman E., Mullender-Wijnsma M.J., Bosker R.J., Doolaard S., Visscher C (2016). Long-Term Effects of Physically Active Academic Lessons on Physical Fitness and Executive Functions in Primary School Children. Health Educ. Res. 31:185–194.
Haverkamp, Wiersma, Vertessen, van Ewijk, Oosterlaan, & Hartman. (2020). Effects of physical activity interventions on cognitive outcomes and academic performance in adolescents and young adults: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences.
He H, Yang Y, Sun J, Wang F, Zhang W, Zhu F. (2025) Effects of school-based physical activity on academic achievement in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. Sep 16;13:1651883.
James J, Pringle A, Mourton S, Roscoe CMP. (2023). The Effects of Physical Activity on Academic Performance in School-Aged Children: A Systematic Review. Children (Basel). Jun 5;10(6):1019.
Maeda J.K., Randall L. (2003). Can Academic Success Come from Five Minutes of Physical Activity? Brock Educ. J. 13:14–22.
Martin-Martinez, Valenzuela, Martinez-Zamora, & Martinez-de-Quel. (2023). School-based physical activity interventions and language skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport.
Nagrale S, Jiandani M. (2024). Challenges and barriers in conducting school-based physical activity research: A narrative review. J Family Med Prim Care. Oct;13(10):4154-4158.
Norris E, van Steen T, Direito A, Stamatakis E. (2020). Physically active lessons in schools and their impact on physical activity, educational, health and cognition outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. Jul;54(14):826-838.
Owen, Foley, Wilhite, Booker, Lonsdale, & Reece. (2022). Sport Participation and Academic Performance in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Medicine and science in sports and exercise.
Peiris D.L.I.H.K., Duan Y., Vandelanotte C., Liang W., Yang M., Baker J.S. (2022). Effects of In-Classroom Physical Activity Breaks on Children’s Academic Performance, Cognition, Health Behaviours and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 19:9479.
Sember, Jurak, Kovac, Morrison, & Starc. (2020). Children’s physical activity, academic performance, and cognitive functioning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health.
Vaquero-Solís M., Gallego D.I., Tapia-Serrano M.Á., Pulido J.J., Sánchez-Miguel P.A. (2020). School-Based Physical Activity Interventions in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17:999.
Webster CA. (2022). The Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program: An Invited Review. Am J Lifestyle Med.May 25;17(6):762-774.
Ziereis S., Jansen P. (2015). Effects of physical activity on executive function and motor performance in children with ADHD. Res. Dev. Disabil.38:181–191. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.005.
Exercise & Fitness
DEFINITIONS
Exercise and fitness can be defined as types of physical activity that, when done regularly and at sufficient intensity, improve students’ physical health and, in turn, support better cognitive functioning, classroom behavior, and academic performance.
Exercise interventions are designed to increase students’ physical activity levels, aiming to improve their physical health, mental well-being, cognitive function, and academic performance. link
DATA
-
14 Meta-analysis reviews
-
521 Research studies
-
94,000 students in studies
-
4 Confidence level. Hattie (2023) p. 113
14 Meta-analysis reviews
521 Research studies
94,000 students in studies
4 Confidence level. Hattie (2023) p. 113
QUOTES
Exercise and fitness are tied to achievement through three primary pathways commonly used in the literature: cognitive skills and attitudes (e.g., attention, mood), academic behaviors (e.g., on-task behavior, attendance), and academic achievement (grades, test scores), all of which show generally positive associations with higher levels of physical activity and fitness. link
For school exercise and fitness programs, avoid practices that shame, exclude, or endanger students, and avoid treating physical activity as expendable “extra” time rather than an essential part of the school day. Link
